From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Alexander Stein <linux@ew.tq-group.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-aggregator binding
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:17:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220091727.5330accd@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD++jLn9KJ2sfMtAxVGbcmWQW=1vxdiMNCDLNg-XV3hJDz=O9w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:57:48 +0100
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 3:34 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Humm, peripheral boards! So there's a connector. You need a connector
> > > > binding. And the one solved binding for such a thing is GPIO! The
> > > > gpio-map property lets you remap GPIOs from one provider (the connector)
> > > > to a parent provider (soc_gpio). It would look something like this:
> > >
> > > Well...some GPIOs are wired to peripheral board connectors...but
> > > some are wired to things like built in LEDs and a few different
> > > on-controller components as well which vary by controller hardware
> > > revisions.
> > >
> > > This gpio-map feature doesn't exist in the mainline kernel does it?
> >
> > For at least the last 5 years. It's even defined in the DT spec
> > (generically as "nexus").
>
> I actually tested this. It works.
>
> It's however a bit annoying that we do not have a single upstream
> DTS file using it, so there are no examples to look at other than
> in the documentation.
>
> I suppose there would also be greater buy-in to the concept if
> we had managed to push the same for at least I2C and SPI,
> but it's easy to ask other people to work, I know that.
Nexus for I2C or SPI will not work.
In fact, busses cannot work with nexus node concept.
A nexus node translate a phandle.
prop = <&nexus X> is, in the end, translated to <&controller Y>.
For busses, you describe devices connected to the bus as sub-nodes of the
bus controller node.
&spi0 {
my_device@0 {
reg = 0;
...
};
};
No phandle involved but labels.
With nexus, you cannot translate &spi0.
Also nexus works well when an index is involved. In other word, it works
well with phandle with args.
i2c-bus = <&i2c0>;
In this kind of of definition, no index are present. With nexus node, this
looks like
i2c-bus = <&nexus>;
How to handle multiple i2c busses with nexus node?
Some ways other than nexus have to explored to handle busses.
Best regards,
Hervé
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-20 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 8:13 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-aggregator binding James Hilliard
2026-02-11 8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: aggregator: add gpio-aggregator DT compatible James Hilliard
2026-02-11 9:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-11 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 10:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-11 10:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 11:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-11 10:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 10:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-11 10:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 10:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 21:47 ` Rob Herring
2026-02-11 21:49 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-12 7:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-12 19:16 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-13 7:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-13 8:02 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-13 8:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-13 8:29 ` Herve Codina
2026-02-13 8:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-13 23:03 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-11 8:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-aggregator binding Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 8:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 8:28 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-11 8:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-11 17:01 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-12 14:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-12 16:53 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-12 19:54 ` Rob Herring
2026-02-12 21:22 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-13 8:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-13 18:34 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-16 9:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-19 18:00 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-19 18:29 ` Rob Herring
2026-02-19 22:14 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-19 22:28 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-19 23:00 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-19 23:06 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-19 23:12 ` Rob Herring
2026-02-20 4:57 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-20 8:24 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-20 11:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-13 14:34 ` Rob Herring
2026-02-13 22:49 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-16 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-19 17:57 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-20 8:17 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2026-02-20 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
2026-02-20 9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-20 13:07 ` Herve Codina
2026-02-20 13:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 8:34 ` James Hilliard
2026-02-11 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 9:57 ` Herve Codina
2026-02-11 10:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-11 10:58 ` Herve Codina
2026-02-11 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260220091727.5330accd@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox