public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Tabrez Ahmed <tabreztalks@gmail.com>
Cc: dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: Use scoped_guard() in trigger handler
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 15:58:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260222155845.2b0b7824@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260221142500.87016-1-tabreztalks@gmail.com>

On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:55:00 +0530
Tabrez Ahmed <tabreztalks@gmail.com> wrote:

> Replace the manual mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls with the
> scoped_guard() macro in ads1015_trigger_handler(). This simplifies
> the locking logic by ensuring the mutex is always properly released
> out of scope, while maintaining the trigger notification on the
> error path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tabrez Ahmed <tabreztalks@gmail.com>
Hi Tabrez,

Take a look at the comments in cleanup.h 

Basic rule is don't combine guard() or __free() with
gotos.  The actual bugs that avoids aren't present in your patch
but to keep things simple for review, that rule stands anyway.

See below for alternative.

> ---
> Compile-tested only.
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> index f2a93c63ca14..582d30c07874 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c
> @@ -451,18 +451,16 @@ static irqreturn_t ads1015_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  	} scan = { };
>  	int chan, ret, res;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> -	chan = find_first_bit(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> -			      iio_get_masklength(indio_dev));
> -	ret = ads1015_get_adc_result(data, chan, &res);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -		goto err;
> +	scoped_guard(mutex, &data->lock) {
> +		chan = find_first_bit(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> +				      iio_get_masklength(indio_dev));
> +		ret = ads1015_get_adc_result(data, chan, &res);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		scan.chan = res;
>  	}
>  
> -	scan.chan = res;

There was never any reason to hold the lock over this assignment as
scan.chan and res are both local variables.

Hence, this can become something like

	mutex_lock(&data->lock);
	chan = find_first_bit(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
			      iio_get_masklength(indio_dev));
	ret = ads1015_get_adc_result(data, chan, &res);
	mutex_unlock(data->lock);
	if (ret < 0)
		goto err;

	scan_chan = res;
...

Which gets you most of the advantages of using scoped_guard()
(no need to unlock in multiple paths) without running into problems
due to the goto.

Jonathan

> -	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -
>  	iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
>  				    iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
>  


      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-22 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-21 14:25 [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: Use scoped_guard() in trigger handler Tabrez Ahmed
2026-02-22 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260222155845.2b0b7824@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=tabreztalks@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox