From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CC11EDA2C; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771929065; cv=none; b=V6AnBe4hesNV9ObEqFs42C3ChOKo/eiQ8uEiR1iQHpTmN0oFWzFmxe893ZzOxmGbH/XCgWgojuLqSXSAIMewzFI1XjBwc5Dpf6O72y9Pq3+tENjmaDWagguz0/qtPoPYkrL7c9OheXKoRQJYSkDw5I7v3bmg0N8p9YLML7C/2eQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771929065; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oUwk8VP9X5cwOfy2FaQDDjO2Cz9u/z4sh5gcdr9Ylx4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l0OGM9SetIB6tljaFErOY6nRpA6M90yWnBtW5OYoJtbdIO1lid0FuWvc7LMUU40RieZ+Big4ggz5jxKtYoXsBUjgeVvUQPsmBelZOAawFHbbw0piEJK6R25U4Cqq8Jp3xQ8WCe+k+Qrm+uKlGJA1K3Cy5xy9w576vgLvCq5KOTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XJc65pZF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XJc65pZF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ACDBC116D0; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:31:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771929065; bh=oUwk8VP9X5cwOfy2FaQDDjO2Cz9u/z4sh5gcdr9Ylx4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XJc65pZFDlsZzYhzthM1hMrgBmoCoDRrZXYo8ZXGTAAiBaqdsf54Np++GWVGUvvoC 0pz/rfohc9lRY0RXJZTvHS/qyGw1ZIQlbsTLz8o6hbr9L1i1oy38rqutgO1Vtkev1P 22Ja3XtxWP2KCAqX6CuVF3QkH2KcHrQmkBWxN/x0LNnjG/w4SmjNdg0hPTz/QWKqnd EYlZikYgFjCRULv1KP5Hc0VEhvcUA7HQy0+e8SoPqrOHViszFP7Cz1dPBVb51eF1ID UDGPuaUrmTI6Zm3YKLWvQRYb44/p19BnjdaCM9HsM/uE64YeFqJkcb69ZxSsCwof5d 3PKIpr1BPzk7A== Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:31:00 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Cc: David Airlie , Sumit Semwal , Alex Deucher , Simona Vetter , Gerd Hoffmann , Dmitry Osipenko , Gurchetan Singh , Chia-I Wu , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Lucas De Marchi , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Rodrigo Vivi , Jason Gunthorpe , Kevin Tian , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Felix Kuehling , Alex Williamson , Ankit Agrawal , Vivek Kasireddy , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] dma-buf: Use revoke mechanism to invalidate shared buffers Message-ID: <20260224103100.GI10607@unreal> References: <20260131-dmabuf-revoke-v7-0-463d956bd527@nvidia.com> <20260217080206.GJ12989@unreal> <0aa8147c-254d-4a1c-89ee-9dc4d4b6b022@amd.com> <20260217133431.GN12989@unreal> <90088594-5835-4f4f-9e69-aaee67109aa1@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <90088594-5835-4f4f-9e69-aaee67109aa1@amd.com> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 07:55:15PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > On 2/17/26 14:34, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 10:52:25AM +0100, Christian König wrote: > >> On 2/17/26 09:02, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 07:34:10AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >>>> Changelog: > >>>> v7: > >>>> * Fixed messed VFIO patch due to rebase. > >>> > >>> <...> > >>> > >>> Christian, > >>> > >>> What should be my next step? Should I resubmit it? > >> > >> No, the patches are fine as they are. I'm just waiting for the backmerge of upstream to apply them. > > And pushed to drm-misc-next. > > There was a minor merge conflict in patch #5. I think I fixed it up correctly, but only compile tested the result. You resolved it correctly. > > Would probably be good time to now test drm-misc-next if you have some userspace test cases. Sure, thanks a lot. > > Regards, > Christian. > > > > > Thanks >