public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Ramesh Errabolu <ramesh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: Add write-only 'uevent' sysfs attribute for PCI slots
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:34:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226083427.GF12611@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225150815.81268-1-ramesh@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 09:08:15AM -0600, Ramesh Errabolu wrote:
> Add a new write-only 'uevent' attribute to PCI slot sysfs
> entries. This provides a mechanism for userspace to explicitly
> synthesize PCI slot uevents when needed.
> 
> For cold-plugged PCI devices, slots may be created before
> udev is ready to receive events, causing the initial 'add'
> uevents to be missed. As a result, slot specific udev
> rules that define naming, permissions, and related policies,
> are not applied at boot. Allowing userspace to resynthesize
> the 'add' uevent ensures these rules are processed correctly.

This patch sounds like a hack to me. AFAIK, "udevadm trigger"
performs exactly that.

Thanks

> 
> The patch was validated by manually triggering PCI slot 'add'
> uevents through the slot’s 'uevent' sysfs file and confirming
> that udev received and processed those events. The following
> command raises an 'add' uevent for a specific PCI slot:
> 
>     $ echo "add $(uuidgen)" | sudo tee   \
>                 /sys/bus/pci/slots/<slot-id>/uevent
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramesh Errabolu <ramesh@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/slot.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c
> index 787311614e5b..cbc7cf6ab7ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ static ssize_t cur_speed_read_file(struct pci_slot *slot, char *buf)
>  	return bus_speed_read(slot->bus->cur_bus_speed, buf);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t uevent_write_file(struct pci_slot *slot,
> +				 const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	rc = kobject_synth_uevent(&slot->kobj, buf, len);
> +	return rc ? rc : len;
> +}
> +
>  static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev;
> @@ -89,11 +98,14 @@ static struct pci_slot_attribute pci_slot_attr_max_speed =
>  	__ATTR(max_bus_speed, S_IRUGO, max_speed_read_file, NULL);
>  static struct pci_slot_attribute pci_slot_attr_cur_speed =
>  	__ATTR(cur_bus_speed, S_IRUGO, cur_speed_read_file, NULL);
> +static struct pci_slot_attribute pci_slot_attr_uevent =
> +	__ATTR(uevent, S_IWUSR, NULL, uevent_write_file);
>  
>  static struct attribute *pci_slot_default_attrs[] = {
>  	&pci_slot_attr_address.attr,
>  	&pci_slot_attr_max_speed.attr,
>  	&pci_slot_attr_cur_speed.attr,
> +	&pci_slot_attr_uevent.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pci_slot_default);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25 15:08 [PATCH v1] PCI: Add write-only 'uevent' sysfs attribute for PCI slots Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26  8:34 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-02-26 17:53   ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26 18:39     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-26 19:31       ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26 19:51         ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-26 20:33           ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-27 11:23       ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-03-02 19:48         ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-06 15:15           ` Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260226083427.GF12611@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ramesh@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox