From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>,
syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 07:39:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260228073959.0ef1b33f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228031400.163009-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 11:13:59 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
>
> fib_check_nexthop() does not validate that the nexthop family matches
> the route family. This allows an IPv4 route to reference an IPv6
> nexthop object. When the IPv4 route is looked up, __mkroute_output()
> accesses nhc->nhc_pcpu_rth_output which is never allocated for IPv6
> nexthops (fib6_nh_init does not call fib_nh_common_init), causing a
> NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Note that this is not about IPv4 routes with IPv6 gateways (RFC 5549),
> which uses an AF_INET nexthop with nhc_gw_family=AF_INET6 and properly
> allocates nhc_pcpu_rth_output via fib_nh_common_init(). The bug here
> is an AF_INET6 nexthop object being directly referenced by an IPv4
> route, which is an invalid combination.
>
> Add the missing family check in fib_check_nexthop(), mirroring what
> fib6_check_nexthop() already does for the reverse direction (rejecting
> IPv6 routes that reference IPv4 nexthop objects).
AFAICT this breaks a bunch of tests, quickest to repro with is
gre_multipath_nh.sh but you should probably run fib_nexthops.sh
on your fix as well.
> Reproducer:
>
> unshare -rn
> ip link set lo up
> ip nexthop add id 100 via fe80::1 dev lo
> ip route add 172.20.20.0/24 nhid 100
> ping -c1 172.20.20.1
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-28 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 3:13 [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop Jiayuan Chen
2026-02-28 15:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-28 16:33 ` David Ahern
2026-02-28 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-01 1:57 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-01 18:05 ` David Ahern
2026-03-01 18:11 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260228073959.0ef1b33f@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@shopee.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox