From: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/bpf: bpf_cookie: skip kprobe_multi tests without bpf_testmod
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:45:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260228074555.122950-2-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228074555.122950-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
The kprobe_multi subtests rely on bpf_testmod fentry ksyms.
When bpf_testmod isn't available, libbpf fails to resolve
bpf_testmod_fentry_test* and skeleton load fails with -ESRCH, causing
false failures.
Skip these subtests when env.has_testmod is false.
Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
No functional change.
Drop the unrelated perf_event_open() argument change from this patch
(moved to patch 2/2).
v1: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260227164037.84110-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index 75f4dff7d042..b7643a5bf7ad 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ static void kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest(void)
unsigned long long addrs[8];
__u64 cookies[8];
+ if (!env.has_testmod) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms(), "load_kallsyms"))
goto cleanup;
@@ -192,6 +197,11 @@ static void kprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest(void)
};
__u64 cookies[8];
+ if (!env.has_testmod) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
skel = kprobe_multi__open_and_load();
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fentry_raw_skel_load"))
goto cleanup;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-28 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 7:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_cookie failures Sun Jian
2026-02-28 7:45 ` Sun Jian [this message]
2026-03-02 10:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/bpf: bpf_cookie: skip kprobe_multi tests without bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2026-02-28 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: bpf_cookie: make perf_event subtest trigger reliably Sun Jian
2026-03-02 10:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-03-03 2:15 ` sun jian
2026-03-03 21:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-03-05 23:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_cookie failures patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260228074555.122950-2-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--to=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox