public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Kevin Cheng <chengkev@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Drop redundant call to kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2026 15:42:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302154249.784529-1-yosry@kernel.org> (raw)

In kvm_check_and_inject_events(), kvm_deliver_exception_payload() is
called for pending #DB exceptions. However, shortly after, the
per-vendor inject_exception callbacks are made. Both
vmx_inject_exception() and svm_inject_exception() unconditionally call
kvm_deliver_exception_payload(), so the call in
kvm_check_and_inject_events() is redundant.

Note that the extra call for pending #DB exceptions is harmless, as
kvm_deliver_exception_payload() clears exception.has_payload after the
first call.

The call in kvm_check_and_inject_events() was added in commit
f10c729ff965 ("kvm: vmx: Defer setting of DR6 until #DB delivery"). At
that point, the call was likely needed because svm_queue_exception()
checked whether an exception for L2 is intercepted by L1 before calling
kvm_deliver_exception_payload(), as SVM did not have a
check_nested_events callback. Since DR6 is updated before the #DB
intercept in SVM (unlike VMX), it was necessary to deliver the DR6
payload before calling svm_queue_exception().

After that, commit 7c86663b68ba ("KVM: nSVM: inject exceptions via
svm_check_nested_events") added a check_nested_events callback for SVM,
which checked for L1 intercepts for L2's exceptions, and delivered the
the payload appropriately before the intercept. At that point,
svm_queue_exception() started calling kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
unconditionally, and the call to kvm_deliver_exception_payload() from
its caller became redundant.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index db3f393192d94..a9080418f3cfd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10737,12 +10737,10 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			__kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) |
 					     X86_EFLAGS_RF);
 
-		if (vcpu->arch.exception.vector == DB_VECTOR) {
-			kvm_deliver_exception_payload(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.exception);
-			if (vcpu->arch.dr7 & DR7_GD) {
-				vcpu->arch.dr7 &= ~DR7_GD;
-				kvm_update_dr7(vcpu);
-			}
+		if (vcpu->arch.exception.vector == DB_VECTOR &&
+		    vcpu->arch.dr7 & DR7_GD) {
+			vcpu->arch.dr7 &= ~DR7_GD;
+			kvm_update_dr7(vcpu);
 		}
 
 		kvm_inject_exception(vcpu);

base-commit: 183bb0ce8c77b0fd1fb25874112bc8751a461e49
-- 
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-02 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-02 15:42 Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2026-03-02 15:51 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Drop redundant call to kvm_deliver_exception_payload() Sean Christopherson
2026-03-02 15:55   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-03-05 17:07 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260302154249.784529-1-yosry@kernel.org \
    --to=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengkev@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox