From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ramesh Errabolu <ramesh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: Add write-only 'uevent' sysfs attribute for PCI slots
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 21:48:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302194844.GU12611@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d30ad0a-9c16-4802-adfe-e795c38f5990@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 12:23:03PM +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 2/26/2026 7:39 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 11:53:32AM -0600, Ramesh Errabolu wrote:
> >> On 2/26/2026 2:34 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 09:08:15AM -0600, Ramesh Errabolu wrote:
> >>>> Add a new write-only 'uevent' attribute to PCI slot sysfs
> >>>> entries. This provides a mechanism for userspace to explicitly
> >>>> synthesize PCI slot uevents when needed.
> >>>>
> >>>> For cold-plugged PCI devices, slots may be created before
> >>>> udev is ready to receive events, causing the initial 'add'
> >>>> uevents to be missed. As a result, slot specific udev
> >>>> rules that define naming, permissions, and related policies,
> >>>> are not applied at boot. Allowing userspace to resynthesize
> >>>> the 'add' uevent ensures these rules are processed correctly.
> >>> This patch sounds like a hack to me. AFAIK, "udevadm trigger"
> >>> performs exactly that.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>
> >> AFAIK, PCI slots do not yet raise a uevent.
>
> That is only partially true. PCI slots are represented in sysfs by a
> kobject (pci_slot.kobj) and pci_hotplug_core generates uevents for these
> kobjects during pci_hp_add() [1].
>
> Here is an example for these uevents:
>
> KERNEL[62021.190266] add /bus/pci/slots/000018d0 (slots)
> ACTION=add
> DEVPATH=/bus/pci/slots/000018d0
> SUBSYSTEM=slots
> SEQNUM=1638
>
> KERNEL[62032.304390] remove /bus/pci/slots/000018d0 (slots)
> ACTION=remove
> DEVPATH=/bus/pci/slots/000018d0
> SUBSYSTEM=slots
> SEQNUM=1682
>
> On s390 there is a use case for reacting to these events via udev rules,
> namely to persistently apply a user-specified, per-slot power state.
But the component that issues the uevent should create this file.
In your example, it is the hotplug code that must provide a writable
file, isn't it?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-25 15:08 [PATCH v1] PCI: Add write-only 'uevent' sysfs attribute for PCI slots Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26 8:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-26 17:53 ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26 18:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-26 19:31 ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-26 19:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-26 20:33 ` Ramesh Errabolu
2026-02-27 11:23 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-03-02 19:48 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-03-06 15:15 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260302194844.GU12611@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ramesh@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox