public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: "Panagiotis \"Ivory\" Vasilopoulos" <git@n0toose.net>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Dan Cojocaru" <dan@dcdev.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] landlock: Expand restrict flags example for ABI version 8
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 10:08:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260303.13455f40d0c5@gnoack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260228-landlock-docs-add-tsync-example-v3-1-140ab50f0524@n0toose.net>

On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 10:36:59PM +0100, Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> index 13134bccdd39d78ddce3daf454f32dda162ce91b..b71ac7aa308260b8141e5d35248fb68cec6dcba9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> @@ -196,13 +196,33 @@ similar backwards compatibility check is needed for the restrict flags
>  (see sys_landlock_restrict_self() documentation for available flags):
>  
>  .. code-block:: c
> -
> -    __u32 restrict_flags = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON;
> -    if (abi < 7) {
> -        /* Clear logging flags unsupported before ABI 7. */
> +    __u32 restrict_flags =
> +        LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON |
> +        LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
> +    switch (abi) {
> +    case 1 ... 6:
> +        /* Clear logging flags unsupported for ABI < 7 */
>          restrict_flags &= ~(LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF |
>                              LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON |
>                              LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF);
> +        __attribute__((fallthrough));
> +    case 7:
> +        /* Removes multithreaded enforcement flag unsupported for ABI < 8 */
> +        /*
> +         * WARNING!
> +         * Don't copy-paste this just yet! This example impacts enforcement
> +         * and can potentially decrease protection if misused.
> +         *
> +         * Below ABI v8, a Landlock policy can only be enforced for the calling
> +         * thread and its children. This behavior remains a default for ABI v8,
> +         * but the flag ``LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC`` can now be used to
> +         * enforce policies across all threads of the calling process. If an
> +         * application's Landlock integration was designed under the assumption
> +         * that the flag is used (such as when children threads are responsible
> +         * for enforcing and/or overriding policies of parents and siblings),
> +         * removing said flag can decrease protection for older Linux versions.
> +         */
> +        restrict_flags &= ~LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC;
>      }

Hello!

Sorry for nit-picking even further here;

* You have two immediately adjacent comments here which should be
  merged into one.
* It is enough to use a more terse warning here;
  would suggest something like:

/*
 * Removes multithreaded enforcement flag unsupported for ABI < 8.
 *
 * WARNING: Calling landlock_restrict_self(2) without this flag
 * is only equivalent if the calling process is single-threaded.
 */

Thanks,
–Günther

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-03  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-28 21:36 [PATCH v3] landlock: Expand restrict flags example for ABI version 8 Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos
2026-03-03  9:08 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2026-03-03 18:01 ` Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260303.13455f40d0c5@gnoack.org \
    --to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan@dcdev.ro \
    --cc=git@n0toose.net \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox