From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, will@kernel.org,
maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dma-mapping: Use the correct phys_to_dma() for DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 17:03:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305170335.963568-3-smostafa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305170335.963568-1-smostafa@google.com>
As restricted dma pools are always decrypted, in swiotlb.c it uses
phys_to_dma_unencrypted() for address conversion.
However, in DMA-direct, calls to phys_to_dma_direct() with
force_dma_unencrypted() returning false, will fallback to
phys_to_dma() which is inconsistent for memory allocated from
restricted dma pools.
Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 27d804f0473f..1a402bb956d9 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ u64 zone_dma_limit __ro_after_init = DMA_BIT_MASK(24);
static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma_direct(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t phys)
{
- if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
+ if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev) || is_swiotlb_for_alloc(dev))
return phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, phys);
return phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
}
--
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 17:03 [RFC PATCH 0/2] dma-mapping: DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL and encryption Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-05 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Avoid double decrypting with DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-10 13:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-10 13:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-11 12:25 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-03-13 7:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-03-05 17:03 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-03-10 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dma-mapping: Use the correct phys_to_dma() for DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Catalin Marinas
2026-03-10 13:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-11 12:28 ` Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305170335.963568-3-smostafa@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox