From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0B71D5141; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 03:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772766320; cv=none; b=iQwq1VuWN90iPgWXylko+eUuUYe1JlazK4QjGw5R61R8aMLfBI8vc+kgZmoxfLqGkAydCAk7nz/yBF0AdCFjYylHhN35C77wUxaojDq+vjYK2Lg4hAPAHETglqLaVoQrzM7ATurXmm5cMrvLYj1f8iJgcFPcKryQC63aGt3xm+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772766320; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H8L6ZEad7WGRIzCLFVbmdG3T2DyNrEqX3CcywGBEtQo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MlkDM16gyPnVLCVn5X2zyPPM+CMNwrral7tvSiDrSwpswr5+KJnes17snApsqeYdEu7JOj11Q8mS2PN6bHwXCFNOg+B5ZwiVM++piYzDisOs0kAREi144As1oQ+AfMWRyj8S7UMaM/ZEw7CThUoYTq1BmY/7Y8+cYDnZIAC4MMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IJGVKdT5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IJGVKdT5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5287CC116C6; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 03:05:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772766319; bh=H8L6ZEad7WGRIzCLFVbmdG3T2DyNrEqX3CcywGBEtQo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IJGVKdT5SUiYMQjCSLQJYulsHii1yGmoLfvNG0Syd652KtvtL/dckAUu4l6MQZu15 YHP1H4cvZSxoc7vvYRmj5kcm8TdpSY8xmtIaBEE2MN+Dj51EjTRi+u0N1JqzVZYYjo doVLFie+iaiKeej+q2vgmaawFJMuh0b8ScaB6MmpRyM066Hk7Qy4ebGljgCJLupFLy fQExyfAA5tR+On/tyQRHUk3YX0g7LV86/XgJ6dmDaT3qv4HvdxGNcWspyQ7tp29dH9 5M0gyhi2ODo7D4no+9kRYHbq8H//Dlh3Izneiik6RDBeDuwGUeoqvaRN7j+WDfMvoD nzgRL2myjnvRQ== Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:05:18 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= Cc: Michael Chan , Pavan Chebbi , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] bnxt_en: Resize RSS contexts on channel count change Message-ID: <20260305190518.4dce9ccc@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260304131855.3225539-3-bjorn@kernel.org> References: <20260304131855.3225539-1-bjorn@kernel.org> <20260304131855.3225539-3-bjorn@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 14:18:52 +0100 Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel wrote: > + if (netif_is_rxfh_configured(dev) && > + ethtool_rxfh_can_resize(bp->rss_indir_tbl, > + old_tbl_size, new_tbl_size)) { Doesn't this read a little odd? Shouldn't ethtool_rxfh_can_resize() return true when ... we can resize? You end up ignoring the real rc here, and it can only ever be -EINVAL. > + netdev_warn(dev, "RSS table resize not possible\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + }