From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Validate UHS/DDR/HS200 timing selection for 1-bit bus width
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 20:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306124812.332098-2-shawn.lin@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306124812.332098-1-shawn.lin@linux.dev>
From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
UHS/DDR/HS200 modes require at least 4-bit bus support. Host controllers
that lack relevant capability registers rely on paring properties provided
by firmware, which may incorrectly set these modes. Now that mmc_validate_host_caps()
has been introduced to validate such configuration violations, let's also
add checks for UHS/DDR/HS200 modes.
This fixes an issue where, if the HS200/HS400 property is set while only a
1-bit bus width is used, mmc_select_hs200() returns 0 without actually performing
the mode switch. Consequently, mmc_select_timing() proceeds without falling back to
mmc_select_hs(), leaving the eMMC device operating in legacy mode (26 MHz) instead
of switching to High Speed mode (52 MHz).
Signed-off-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
[Shawn: reword the commit msg and drop HS400 change]
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
---
drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
index 88c95db..d1d4870 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
@@ -624,6 +624,15 @@ static int mmc_validate_host_caps(struct mmc_host *host)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* UHS/DDR/HS200 modes require at least 4-bit bus */
+ if (!(caps & (MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA)) &&
+ ((caps & (MMC_CAP_UHS | MMC_CAP_DDR)) || (caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS200))) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "drop UHS/DDR/HS200 support since 1-bit bus only\n");
+ host->caps = caps = caps & ~(MMC_CAP_UHS | MMC_CAP_DDR);
+ host->caps2 = caps2 = caps2 & ~MMC_CAP2_HS200;
+ }
+
+ /* HS400 and HS400ES modes require 8-bit bus */
if (caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES | MMC_CAP2_HS400) &&
!(caps & MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA) && !(caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MMC)) {
dev_warn(dev, "drop HS400 support since no 8-bit bus\n");
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 12:48 [PATCH 0/2] Validate and clean up UHS/DDR/HS200 timing checks Shawn Lin
2026-03-06 12:48 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2026-03-09 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Validate UHS/DDR/HS200 timing selection for 1-bit bus width Ulf Hansson
2026-03-10 0:37 ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: Remove checking MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA from mmc_host_can_uhs() Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306124812.332098-2-shawn.lin@linux.dev \
--to=shawn.lin@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox