public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Block <lkml@mageta.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>,
	Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tobias Schumacher <ts@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ionut Nechita <ionut.nechita@windriver.com>,
	Ionut Nechita <ionut_n2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Move declaration of pci_rescan_remove_lock into public pci.h
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 19:01:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306180149.GD762467@chlorum.ategam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aasPgZkgCmW5kZgV@kbusch-mbp>

On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 10:31:45AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 05:49:13PM +0100, Benjamin Block wrote:
> > So far it is possible to use and call the functions
> > pci_lock_rescan_remove() and pci_unlock_rescan_remove() from any PCI
> > code, including modules and architecture code; but the lock
> > `pci_rescan_remove_lock` itself is private to objects residing in
> > `drivers/pci/` via the header `drivers/pci/pci.h`.
> > 
> > With that setup it is not possible to use lockdep annotations such as
> > lockdep_assert_held(), or sparse annotations such as __must_hold() in
> > modules or architecture code for PCI.
> > 
> > Since it is useful for `pci_rescan_remove_lock` to have such
> > annotations, move the variable declaration into `include/linux/pci.h`.
> 
> This big lock for pci scanning is way to easy to misuse to create
> deadlocks, many of which still exist today, 

I can fully appreciate that, having had to deal with bug reports that
stem from it's use for several months at this point.

> so I'm not sure making it easier to access is the right direction.

The thing is, I really would love to be able to annotate our
architecture code where appropriate, and I didn't see any other option.
Explicit annotations in the code highlight far better than putting a
comment in the function/-header.

-- 
Best Regards und Beste Grüße, Benjamin Block
               PGP KeyID: 9610 2BB8 2E17 6F65 2362  6DF2 46E0 4E05 67A3 2E9E

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-06 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06 16:49 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: s390/pci: Fix deadlocks on s390 when releasing zPCI-bus or -device objects Benjamin Block
2026-03-06 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Move declaration of pci_rescan_remove_lock into public pci.h Benjamin Block
2026-03-06 17:31   ` Keith Busch
2026-03-06 18:01     ` Benjamin Block [this message]
2026-03-06 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/pci: Fix circular/recursive deadlocks in PCI-bus and -device release Benjamin Block
2026-03-06 16:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: Provide lock guard for pci_rescan_remove_lock Benjamin Block
2026-03-06 16:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/pci: Use " Benjamin Block
2026-03-09  7:38   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-09 10:54     ` Benjamin Block
2026-03-09 15:49       ` Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260306180149.GD762467@chlorum.ategam.org \
    --to=lkml@mageta.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ionut.nechita@windriver.com \
    --cc=ionut_n2001@yahoo.com \
    --cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ts@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox