From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
emil@etsalapatis.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:06:12 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306190623.1076074-5-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306190623.1076074-1-tj@kernel.org>
Change find_global_dsq() to take a CPU number directly instead of a task
pointer. This prepares for callers where the CPU is available but the task is
not.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index c36d399bca3e..c44893878878 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -341,10 +341,9 @@ static bool scx_is_descendant(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_sched *ancestor)
for ((pos) = scx_next_descendant_pre(NULL, (root)); (pos); \
(pos) = scx_next_descendant_pre((pos), (root)))
-static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_global_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch,
- struct task_struct *p)
+static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_global_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 tcpu)
{
- return &sch->pnode[cpu_to_node(task_cpu(p))]->global_dsq;
+ return &sch->pnode[cpu_to_node(tcpu)]->global_dsq;
}
static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_user_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)
@@ -1266,7 +1265,7 @@ static void dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
scx_error(sch, "attempting to dispatch to a destroyed dsq");
/* fall back to the global dsq */
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
- dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p));
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
}
}
@@ -1474,7 +1473,7 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue_locked(struct task_struct *p,
static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_dsq_for_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch,
struct rq *rq, u64 dsq_id,
- struct task_struct *p)
+ s32 tcpu)
{
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq;
@@ -1485,20 +1484,19 @@ static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_dsq_for_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch,
s32 cpu = dsq_id & SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_CPU_MASK;
if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, "in SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON dispatch verdict"))
- return find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ return find_global_dsq(sch, tcpu);
return &cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq;
}
if (dsq_id == SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL)
- dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, tcpu);
else
dsq = find_user_dsq(sch, dsq_id);
if (unlikely(!dsq)) {
- scx_error(sch, "non-existent DSQ 0x%llx for %s[%d]",
- dsq_id, p->comm, p->pid);
- return find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ scx_error(sch, "non-existent DSQ 0x%llx", dsq_id);
+ return find_global_dsq(sch, tcpu);
}
return dsq;
@@ -1540,7 +1538,7 @@ static void direct_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
{
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq =
- find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, rq, p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id, p);
+ find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, rq, p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id, task_cpu(p));
touch_core_sched_dispatch(rq, p);
@@ -1683,7 +1681,7 @@ static void do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
dsq = &rq->scx.local_dsq;
goto enqueue;
global:
- dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p));
goto enqueue;
bypass:
dsq = bypass_enq_target_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p));
@@ -2140,7 +2138,7 @@ static struct rq *move_task_between_dsqs(struct scx_sched *sch,
dst_rq = container_of(dst_dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
if (src_rq != dst_rq &&
unlikely(!task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, dst_rq, true))) {
- dst_dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, p);
+ dst_dsq = find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p));
dst_rq = src_rq;
}
} else {
@@ -2269,7 +2267,7 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
if (src_rq != dst_rq &&
unlikely(!task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, dst_rq, true))) {
- dispatch_enqueue(sch, rq, find_global_dsq(sch, p), p,
+ dispatch_enqueue(sch, rq, find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p)), p,
enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
return;
}
@@ -2407,7 +2405,7 @@ static void finish_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
BUG_ON(!(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_QUEUED));
- dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq(), dsq_id, p);
+ dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq(), dsq_id, task_cpu(p));
if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL)
dispatch_to_local_dsq(sch, rq, dsq, p, enq_flags);
@@ -2647,7 +2645,7 @@ static void process_ddsp_deferred_locals(struct rq *rq)
list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
- dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, rq, p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id, p);
+ dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, rq, p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id, task_cpu(p));
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(dsq->id != SCX_DSQ_LOCAL))
dispatch_to_local_dsq(sch, rq, dsq, p,
p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags);
@@ -7410,7 +7408,7 @@ static bool scx_dsq_move(struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern *kit,
}
/* @p is still on $src_dsq and stable, determine the destination */
- dst_dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq, dsq_id, p);
+ dst_dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq, dsq_id, task_cpu(p));
/*
* Apply vtime and slice updates before moving so that the new time is
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 19:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Relocate scx_bpf_task_cgroup() and its BTF_ID to the end of kfunc section Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:45 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Wrap global DSQs in per-node structure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:52 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Factor out pnode allocation and deallocation into helpers Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:54 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:21 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-03-06 21:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:21 ` [PATCH " Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate reenq_local() and run_deferred() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:09 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:34 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-07 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate run_deferred() and its callees Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:12 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for remote local DSQ reenqueue Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:33 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Add per-CPU data to DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 22:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 22:56 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Factor out nldsq_cursor_next_task() and nldsq_cursor_lost_task() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Optimize schedule_dsq_reenq() with lockless fast path Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Simplify task state handling Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Add SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON flags Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:14 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Andrea Righi
2026-03-07 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306190623.1076074-5-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox