public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: core: Remove checking MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA from mmc_host_can_uhs()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:35:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310013553.29332-3-shawn.lin@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310013553.29332-1-shawn.lin@linux.dev>

The bus width support for UHS mode is now validated in mmc_validate_host_caps().
Therefore, we can safely remove the explicit MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA check from
mmc_host_can_uhs(). As part of this cleanup, simplify the condition by using
the consolidated MMC_CAP_UHS flag.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@linux.dev>
---

Changes in v2: None

 drivers/mmc/core/host.h | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.h b/drivers/mmc/core/host.h
index 5941d68..6bce5a4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.h
@@ -56,11 +56,7 @@ static inline int mmc_host_can_access_boot(struct mmc_host *host)
 
 static inline int mmc_host_can_uhs(struct mmc_host *host)
 {
-	return host->caps &
-		(MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR12 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR25 |
-		 MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR50 | MMC_CAP_UHS_SDR104 |
-		 MMC_CAP_UHS_DDR50) &&
-	       host->caps & MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
+	return host->caps & MMC_CAP_UHS;
 }
 
 static inline bool mmc_card_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10  1:35 [PATCH v2 0/2] Validate and clean up UHS/DDR/HS200 timing checks Shawn Lin
2026-03-10  1:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: core: Validate UHS/DDR/HS200 timing selection for 1-bit bus width Shawn Lin
2026-03-10  1:35 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2026-03-16 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Validate and clean up UHS/DDR/HS200 timing checks Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310013553.29332-3-shawn.lin@linux.dev \
    --to=shawn.lin@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox