Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-29T06:01:23Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1864 bytes --]

Hi Ingo,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:26:04 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:24:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/mmzone.h:9:0,
> > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/kmod.h:22,
> > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/module.h:13,
> > > from /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:2:
> > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c: In function 'blk_mq_queue_enter':
> > > /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/wait.h:772:2: error: expected ';' before '__ret'
> > > __ret; \
> > > ^
> > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:8: note: in expansion of macro 'wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq'
> > > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> > > ^
> > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> > > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> > > ^
> > >
> > > Caused by commit 35a2af94c7ce ("sched/wait: Make the __wait_event*()
> > > interface more friendly").
> > >
> > > Since this was also in next-20131025, I applied the following merge fix
> > > commit for today, please fix this in the tip tree.
> >
> > FWIW I got confirmation on Oct 23 that this had been committed to the
> > tip tree. So I guess it just wasn't pushed yet.
>
> I merged the fix intoo the linux-next branch earlier today so it
> should be resolved soon.

Excellent, thanks.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]