Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-30T15:09:09Z

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> On 03/30/2015 03:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:15:37 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll drop the VDSO stuff from the ARM tree; I can't see a way to keep
> >> it in my tree and keep my tree buildable without dragging in the tip
> >> tree.
> >
> > Does it affect your tree on its own? If not, then it can be fixed when
> > merged as I have done, or if you look at the tip tree, all you really
> > need to merge is tip timers/core branch (which I am sure the tip guys
> > can tell you if it is stable enough) which is about 28 commits ...
> >
> >> The ARM VDSO stuff will just have to wait for 4.2 instead.
> >
> > If that works for you.
>
> FWIW, Stephen's merge fix is correct and I have run my vdso tests
> without problems on OMAP5 with next-20150330.

Hopefully, I can pull the tip stuff but if not, I'll try to remember
to include Stephen's patch with my pull request, but I can't make any
guarantees - Stephen's email will very quickly get buried in my mailbox,
and I'll most likely forget about it too... I'm notoriously bad with
email...

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.