From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <akashi.tkhro@gmail.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] arm_scmi: pinctrl: allow PINCTRL_REQUEST to return EOPNOTSUPP
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312-abstract-dazzling-herring-94de74@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e10b198aa9ed7a9cda6d0e9033a00d1c700ecf9b.1773150895.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:39:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The SCMI protocol specification says that the PINCTRL_REQUEST and
> PINCTRL_RELEASE commands are optional. So if the SCMI server returns
> -EOPNOTSUPP, then treat that as success and continue.
>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
I see Linus W has provided review tags too. Though I am assuming it will
go via some other tree as SCMI core change is tiny, just wanted to check
it explicitly so that there is no wrong assumption on my side.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 19:37 [PATCH v3 0/7] gpio: introduce a gpio driver for SCMI Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 19:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] pinctrl: introduce pinctrl_gpio_get_config() Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 20:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-11 21:47 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-11 19:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pinctrl: scmi: Add SCMI_PIN_INPUT_VALUE Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 21:46 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-12 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-03-11 19:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] pinctrl: Delete PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS support Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 21:48 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-11 19:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] pinctrl-scmi: ignore PIN_CONFIG_PERSIST_STATE Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 21:49 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm_scmi: pinctrl: allow PINCTRL_REQUEST to return EOPNOTSUPP Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 21:50 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-12 15:25 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-03-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for pinctrl based generic gpio driver Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 21:53 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-14 0:12 ` Rob Herring
2026-03-11 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] gpio: add " Dan Carpenter
2026-03-11 20:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-11 22:00 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-12 10:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-16 21:08 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-11 21:55 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-16 9:16 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260312-abstract-dazzling-herring-94de74@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=akashi.tkhro@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox