From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A27312815; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773329128; cv=none; b=WaXMaxlSWth69X7rCoMPOPpbz6nCcyW9ma0lVfzmiHDQ1yrcYCYqiC7u+Qi7gpOAmsScZDuBB2oZ8jS50aQxtLNRKyL4tq0jLQ0g4oso4ciU5NMeYy6PzkylR37+ozUmzqJdiqnCXzy1m6/+xJzcDutG8UZm1mRrRMY2dJzBh2E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773329128; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SPRgYaYcRXRx+Oi439MXJIfPzTvRSwq+RQAg9WxA+zI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AjQUhKNWV/Co8Q6wyeraP5/VkdCZ43oPQILNR5H6F/zHu5r64icx9JEjKJ60qJkZsnJMATtYzFGW3KG9KhY1POQHKcA3N6/b8VaLGUaUwP29QPodhMG5tc7Cn5Akc9FOea32FX4F2T6nTVWrU9sKuzfs93W8Q/L1o/X/FA4Oyh4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=anlMdoQk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="anlMdoQk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E27C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773329128; bh=SPRgYaYcRXRx+Oi439MXJIfPzTvRSwq+RQAg9WxA+zI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=anlMdoQkbijqZRi0VJYy8JBbtdJ99d2UOvXTrDzEOVDqrazZ6mlhAWtuLSpH6Ikm7 6ImOvTMCoS58xXWPq/+6X/utGrHIGcvBwgk96I4N/ajMoIwKJWIDLfXvpsS3bO0Z83 +sJ9mXNCSi4hN0WN9fqqUgwL9IuxCYcvPync29cfTlZFa3ABCdAWQISQHK5TaAWJJG /ufBzJ/KTQjmlykVtxvcWqUW4jpt4DPDvSNi277E2jEfIykcwedRIG5rdoPgu5jow+ qRhOZoI1kNCcfSBJr/EWkoLr8E1m2YGHlpDgWGAhs7hzhZ6qWc0W8GUpMzZu5smpht 3wfDkDTqtxj4w== Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:24 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Dan Carpenter Cc: AKASHI Takahiro , Cristian Marussi , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] arm_scmi: pinctrl: allow PINCTRL_REQUEST to return EOPNOTSUPP Message-ID: <20260312-abstract-dazzling-herring-94de74@sudeepholla> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:39:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The SCMI protocol specification says that the PINCTRL_REQUEST and > PINCTRL_RELEASE commands are optional. So if the SCMI server returns > -EOPNOTSUPP, then treat that as success and continue. > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla I see Linus W has provided review tags too. Though I am assuming it will go via some other tree as SCMI core change is tiny, just wanted to check it explicitly so that there is no wrong assumption on my side. -- Regards, Sudeep