From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F732874E3; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773301224; cv=none; b=MvGPq3Ui7AQXLPXTqrGhDkOzMjzYG+B4vOntf8KIV+1SKdk8i3qE0QhQWdcWtfg44F/bONvyDW8JuDs+XSDxvpBvPrgsUBwxPcujvlmCGTiGbmFC+hxDS8rZqPP/F0Bpv7bofZFtdCym7W/rqebAUV1Vxz9OlcviYfLGbhyxkSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773301224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aKj2Org/E5VO5qL3REWrhMeoL6HDqLJVeRv5GP0VDgE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SGtmHXYFIxIeysZ9h/YY2mTLf1IatQvDpAMUobJ/i2e/9eX3s7Jq22PjQ4netJlssnInIk/LEODR5bGp+A5KqaGordqeJQPCycE5JGJ2Mpaf3wNfegYKTAoBlY56edB1Odx6XhLCOSp1u79M0Ut0Jlp8a/WBfIcqsJBHMT3MQiQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=ozKA/ywK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="ozKA/ywK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kwQVT9sbBkJ9n5/ZZxISyyif8zRikfHtdtupM6rsnR0=; b=ozKA/ywKCeCxxRsRkKE5N8/x4N lwtOvu38T1Ag0W3eKrTSgFMr9gRKHI1NRqyygKz5ODaFczbSjXQhTlHO8ajCpXomnKZe698PxGNEY aoxRGYqijHeDtaojxJ00zLjkEmNZd9isVzU3YgaWOE4u6rlmS8G3S2X2FJpFLuvmIMuw0RSTE6frN 7bqZ1RQ1oLCYPuQXIDtSxPUk+23oIkIud6n4QCuRHocvqlwDLdzrB4W3S4nb9xheyEsgIaH8mX9mc fEiNnZfqwhPWEP568hRVpkcwRd9MEgclJpf1qcM4AXv0pGz2z3HsavZA6PZRtYX5VNyFsYB90il7o mTIy9G8A==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w0aeV-0000000AzPq-0lSN; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:40:15 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6051301150; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:40:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:40:13 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Mi, Dapeng" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , Eranian Stephane , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Dapeng Mi , Zide Chen , Falcon Thomas , Xudong Hao , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND Patch 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Add missing branch counters constraint apply Message-ID: <20260312074013.GB606826@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20260228053320.140406-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20260228053320.140406-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20260311201625.GW606826@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0a720411-0b24-42eb-9897-856b1175aa82@linux.intel.com> <20260312064145.GA606826@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 02:52:43PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote: > > Peter, As Ian points out, the patch "perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base > on rdpmc user disable state" has a bug > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fWr2L6miiFZ6Km3HYEdmqp3T0NBL=WY3buKdKztW+HvmA@mail.gmail.com/). > I would posted a patch to fix the issue. Thanks. > Yep, saw that, its gone :-)