public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Joey Gouly" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 KVM/arm64"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 KVM/arm64
	<kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm64: Use scoped resource management in arm.c
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:53:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317175326.000074be@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316-tabba-el2_guard-v1-7-456875a2c6db@google.com>

On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 17:35:28 +0000
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> wrote:

> Migrate manual spin_lock() calls managing mp_state_lock and manual
> mutex_lock() calls managing kvm->arch.config_lock to use the
> guard(spinlock) and guard(mutex) macros.
> 
> This eliminates manual unlock calls on early return paths and
> simplifies the vCPU suspend/resume control flow.
> 
> Change-Id: Ifcd8455d08afa5d00fc200daaa3fb13f6736e6ed
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Trivial stuff.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 410ffd41fd73..017f5bfabe19 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c

>  
>  /**
> @@ -738,9 +736,8 @@ static void __kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
> +	guard(spinlock)(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
>  	__kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> -	spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
>  }
>  
>  bool kvm_arm_vcpu_stopped(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -773,7 +770,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
> +	guard(spinlock)(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
>  
>  	switch (mp_state->mp_state) {
>  	case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> @@ -789,8 +786,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	return 0;

Or even return in the switch legs instead of breaking out.

>  	}
>  
> -	spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }

>  /*
> @@ -944,9 +937,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
> +	guard(mutex)(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
>  	set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags);
> -	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;

Personally I'd make this return 0 whilst you are here so it's obvious this
path only ever returns success.

>  }



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 17:35 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: arm64: Adopt scoped resource management (guard) for EL1 and EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: arm64: Add scoped resource management (guard) for hyp_spinlock Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(hyp_spinlock) in page_alloc.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(hyp_spinlock) in ffa.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-17 18:01     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(hyp_spinlock) in mm.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(hyp_spinlock) in pkvm.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(mutex) in mmu.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm64: Use scoped resource management in arm.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:53   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(spinlock) in psci.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17 17:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(spinlock) in reset.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm64: Use guard(mutex) in pkvm.c Fuad Tabba
2026-03-16 17:39 ` [PATCH 00/10] KVM: arm64: Adopt scoped resource management (guard) for EL1 and EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-03-17  8:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-17  9:06   ` Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260317175326.000074be@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox