* [PATCH v3] lib/bootconfig: guard xbc_node_compose_key_after() buffer size
@ 2026-03-17 18:15 Josh Law
2026-03-17 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Law @ 2026-03-17 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton
Cc: Steven Rostedt, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
xbc_node_compose_key_after() passes a size_t buffer length to
snprintf(), but snprintf() returns int. Guard against size values above
INT_MAX before the loop so the existing truncation check can continue to
compare ret against (int)size safely.
Add a small WARN_ON_ONCE shim for the tools/bootconfig userspace build
so the same source continues to build there.
Changes since v2:
- Added a comment explaining the INT_MAX guard.
Changes since v1:
- Removed casting ret to size_t; with the INT_MAX guard, the existing
ret >= (int)size check is sufficient, per Steven Rostedt.
- Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260317173703.46092-1-objecting@objecting.org/
Signed-off-by: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
---
lib/bootconfig.c | 8 ++++++++
tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
index 96cbe6738ffe..2a54b51dec5c 100644
--- a/lib/bootconfig.c
+++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
@@ -313,6 +313,14 @@ int __init xbc_node_compose_key_after(struct xbc_node *root,
if (!node && root)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Bootconfig strings never need multi-GB buffers. Reject sizes
+ * above INT_MAX so snprintf()'s int return value cannot overflow
+ * the truncation check below.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > INT_MAX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
while (--depth >= 0) {
node = xbc_nodes + keys[depth];
ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s%s", xbc_node_get_data(node),
diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
index 6784296a0692..48383c10e036 100644
--- a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
+++ b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <errno.h>
+#include <limits.h>
#include <string.h>
@@ -19,6 +20,10 @@
((cond) ? printf("Internal warning(%s:%d, %s): %s\n", \
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, #cond) : 0)
+#ifndef WARN_ON_ONCE
+#define WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) WARN_ON(cond)
+#endif
+
#define unlikely(cond) (cond)
/* Copied from lib/string.c */
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] lib/bootconfig: guard xbc_node_compose_key_after() buffer size
2026-03-17 18:15 [PATCH v3] lib/bootconfig: guard xbc_node_compose_key_after() buffer size Josh Law
@ 2026-03-17 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-17 20:43 ` Josh Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-03-17 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Law
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:15:56 +0000
Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org> wrote:
> xbc_node_compose_key_after() passes a size_t buffer length to
> snprintf(), but snprintf() returns int. Guard against size values above
> INT_MAX before the loop so the existing truncation check can continue to
> compare ret against (int)size safely.
>
> Add a small WARN_ON_ONCE shim for the tools/bootconfig userspace build
> so the same source continues to build there.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Added a comment explaining the INT_MAX guard.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Removed casting ret to size_t; with the INT_MAX guard, the existing
> ret >= (int)size check is sufficient, per Steven Rostedt.
> - Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260317173703.46092-1-objecting@objecting.org/
The changes need to be below the '---' so that they don't get pulled into
the git commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
> ---
<here>
> lib/bootconfig.c | 8 ++++++++
> tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
> index 96cbe6738ffe..2a54b51dec5c 100644
> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,14 @@ int __init xbc_node_compose_key_after(struct xbc_node *root,
> if (!node && root)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * Bootconfig strings never need multi-GB buffers. Reject sizes
> + * above INT_MAX so snprintf()'s int return value cannot overflow
> + * the truncation check below.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > INT_MAX))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> while (--depth >= 0) {
> node = xbc_nodes + keys[depth];
> ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s%s", xbc_node_get_data(node),
> diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> index 6784296a0692..48383c10e036 100644
> --- a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> +++ b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <ctype.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
>
> @@ -19,6 +20,10 @@
> ((cond) ? printf("Internal warning(%s:%d, %s): %s\n", \
> __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, #cond) : 0)
>
> +#ifndef WARN_ON_ONCE
> +#define WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) WARN_ON(cond)
> +#endif
> +
> #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
>
> /* Copied from lib/string.c */
Other than that.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] lib/bootconfig: guard xbc_node_compose_key_after() buffer size
2026-03-17 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-03-17 20:43 ` Josh Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Law @ 2026-03-17 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
On 17 March 2026 20:37:38 GMT, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:15:56 +0000
>Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org> wrote:
>
>> xbc_node_compose_key_after() passes a size_t buffer length to
>> snprintf(), but snprintf() returns int. Guard against size values above
>> INT_MAX before the loop so the existing truncation check can continue to
>> compare ret against (int)size safely.
>>
>> Add a small WARN_ON_ONCE shim for the tools/bootconfig userspace build
>> so the same source continues to build there.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Added a comment explaining the INT_MAX guard.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Removed casting ret to size_t; with the INT_MAX guard, the existing
>> ret >= (int)size check is sufficient, per Steven Rostedt.
>> - Link to v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260317173703.46092-1-objecting@objecting.org/
>
>The changes need to be below the '---' so that they don't get pulled into
>the git commit.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>
>> ---
>
> <here>
>
>> lib/bootconfig.c | 8 ++++++++
>> tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
>> index 96cbe6738ffe..2a54b51dec5c 100644
>> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
>> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
>> @@ -313,6 +313,14 @@ int __init xbc_node_compose_key_after(struct xbc_node *root,
>> if (!node && root)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Bootconfig strings never need multi-GB buffers. Reject sizes
>> + * above INT_MAX so snprintf()'s int return value cannot overflow
>> + * the truncation check below.
>> + */
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > INT_MAX))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> while (--depth >= 0) {
>> node = xbc_nodes + keys[depth];
>> ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s%s", xbc_node_get_data(node),
>> diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
>> index 6784296a0692..48383c10e036 100644
>> --- a/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
>> +++ b/tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> #include <stdbool.h>
>> #include <ctype.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> +#include <limits.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>>
>>
>> @@ -19,6 +20,10 @@
>> ((cond) ? printf("Internal warning(%s:%d, %s): %s\n", \
>> __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, #cond) : 0)
>>
>> +#ifndef WARN_ON_ONCE
>> +#define WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) WARN_ON(cond)
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
>>
>> /* Copied from lib/string.c */
>
>Other than that.
>
>Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
>-- Steve
I'll be convenient, I'll make a V4 just fixing that, You can just recommend the reviewed by tag, thanks a lot
V/R
Josh Law
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-17 20:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-17 18:15 [PATCH v3] lib/bootconfig: guard xbc_node_compose_key_after() buffer size Josh Law
2026-03-17 20:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-17 20:43 ` Josh Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox