From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mux: mmio: Zero the allocated memory
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:42:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031721-fable-creative-74fb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e93db73-20d2-436c-b9e4-4b41e5c237fa@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/03/2026 14:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:48:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Zero the allocated memory in probe() for fields and states for increased
> >> code safety and to match expected Linux coding style.
> >
> > What "style"? I'm all for zeroing out memory to start with, but as this
>
> That style ^^^ that we expect zero'ed memory :).
>
> Also, memory-allocation.rst says:
>
> "And, to be on the safe side it's best to use routines that set memory
> to zero, like kzalloc()."
>
> So the style/preference is actually documented.
>
> > has lived for so long without this, are you sure it's still needed? Are
> > there uninitialized fields in here that we are now properly
> > initializing?
>
> Yes. The second allocation is for "hardware_states" which does not
> receive initialization in the probe, but first assignment is in
> suspend() callback.
>
> Zeroing the first allocation for "fields" is rather style or convention,
> because the probe assigns it further in the probe. However if the driver
> exists probe via error path, these bits would remain random heap data,
> which most likely does not matter.
>
> I can expand commit msg with above.
A changed changelog text would be great, thanks.
And who is supposed to take this, me?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 12:48 [RESEND PATCH] mux: mmio: Zero the allocated memory Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-17 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-17 14:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-17 14:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-17 15:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-01 14:17 Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031721-fable-creative-74fb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox