From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D843921C7 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773834336; cv=none; b=GcQAfv6C9mr6qSHpTVHnoaRdVJKcC3EblLE4MwsrB1ubRtCi2wRWVhilhzdS7HJ3Elf/cn9oDdoQ5i1vvftHcEqwa0zqrzScZobjlZaptHIVPcLymukmU2zGLM6gkC5rpxNv274I5mpUcDVBhyhNElkMJTUoW1pgUria4jtlrCI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773834336; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VVR+rPozuCmk3fPCcBrJvk79JKneXnM9ifrXxXuvJ4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MXcZ+fLou5eHianUtCIvjGOt722JlqmucKNz9TjKDoB8faARV0XcaHbvQy2/I9HTON9vBXu+haIe/kJKgjIesi3YsHtdunkp7oLcmj7+kVBO3e04Dp/4Z09he3SmBC/C4wDoeQsk1/48j6950OL7tO+udaH1J8+/5oF2poE3BjY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=pVWgczWt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="pVWgczWt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1773834333; bh=VVR+rPozuCmk3fPCcBrJvk79JKneXnM9ifrXxXuvJ4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pVWgczWtgCHVgkRPxEQZNHzYnyLFhtuMrjua5Yi0+nf1fMXxgUjQtqq8T9gQwFR0u R/6NRF1fhxYpI1AqWZehaxh5hq/Z5MrhE/gRslOTxBAMy03lT4dGfOk5wEna+FYHub VyQv3ZD/Sw5HYWTr5iKTj+wPfhI3kmI/HmMBSdn5+6N9/lVKkBhVx6IVYsyg5zCbMe sZnxthWs1kKiNW8sDAys/SPfJ2q3PGiEQdxIa2aP45VdZGwkoQUrBH2txvLjyaiozP F73+zMsEpJMoTP6g4AYIsNvcOZvCxgXsRtOU/dBQrwhzeHFyTl4jqm66wzRKptDPHK BbuN/ZHfp6Cnw== Received: from fedora (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2c:6930:d919:a6e:5ea1:8a9f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7B7C17E137B; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:45:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:45:29 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Pedro Demarchi Gomes Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/shmem-helper: Fix Map huge page mapping in fault handler Message-ID: <20260318124529.1269ffc7@fedora> In-Reply-To: References: <20260316002649.211819-1-pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> <20260316152152.1e20d35e@fedora> <20260317183054.5d7030ec@fedora> <20260318111649.2912818b@fedora> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:14:31 -0300 Pedro Demarchi Gomes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 11:16:49AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:30:54 +0100 > > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've played a bit with the drm-misc-{next,fixes} versions (with the extra > > > > pfn_mkwrite fixes on top for the -next variant), and below is my preferred > > > > version (pfn insertion is all handled inside the try_insert_pfn() helper, > > > > with order == PMD_ORDER specialized there). > > > > > > One last thing, the subject should probably be "drm/shmem-helper: Fix > > > huge page mapping in fault handler" (instead of "Fix Map huge page > > > ..."). Pedro, do you think you'll be able to send a v4 before the end > > > of the week? I'd really like to have that fix in -rc5 or -rc6. > > > > If you can't, please let me know, I'll post a new version for you. > > Should I send a patch for the drm-misc-{next,fixes}, or v7.0-rc4? The patch should be against drm-misc-fixes, and if you can port it to drm-misc-next and share the diff, that would be helpful for the merge conflict resolution. > I am planning to send it today. Thanks!