From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9774A275112; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 06:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773900229; cv=none; b=nr2W/rzU+FV3bR+iF/TwakFw6nhYOkn893u5Zm3jgTCHmbtzHQdDGWbtyd/h6EYxlmCaWmDTManEPXgtr+ZSHgUar+cb31DjG/c/fxt3jG2fXd6m+v3y0hgtjzh68zb7OJVyXaCnOFm7XCg8UkpFL8E4IpTPLjaXXaF56/dh9Ms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773900229; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XAo31wvjchd7qx2WnncgWBVcs2xh52+7PQsbU/PUW28=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rj3eNpcyUc/G0gNmCQ45veY6hUDVezjG2eccMqqItE4HULGnaOgAzmJVyk6gJfURc1iYV/iXZ+VvLa6ROoC8uvTpTRCuDFTlLRzU5d1rN+dxXVei+48/2DnLeoTpDNFtW1DZwxA9s6r3vVsVuyAmbW5xtnrpJxg96jVPGkUqaPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=EyP7Mh5H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EyP7Mh5H" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1773900229; x=1805436229; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=XAo31wvjchd7qx2WnncgWBVcs2xh52+7PQsbU/PUW28=; b=EyP7Mh5HxywN1WH5EMiHmjiTbqR9aIbxuwKPAvGrR/L3E4/nJ//5mk6J hWIet4QlshxHh20YQGLzW/41kXdEWVx9sIwNodbnTxsW9xctyXW9xlSb0 47cq3G/QzXYZGB+JPS2RSSsK3RIkbrjAurCkM8rSEgVMyOCCtuEI4WAT4 L7CJF1n+z3PypHV8wYtGp9tdJnKaj1RIKqpeCNMOXF1yvWyNL4TJnrkRL sjEpRqkc+GiDU0S4WZ6JVrg2oOMjP487kPt0mjMhMAtNHOIS714kcx68j fisaBC7zv0zgreFqihgEq6Tfb7W4XpQnMlEcls7wE54LSlkjBoFF/wi8T Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AEUDn3uPRs+0DbuAQ+6NHw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cuAscEFmSTSOT0T3FVOXLw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11733"; a="75151078" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,128,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="75151078" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Mar 2026 23:03:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Msz9q5KsTZaYlGaW7Tv8RQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KyKsGxeQQnen16/M/SLxog== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,128,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="221968155" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Mar 2026 23:03:47 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DEB5995; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 07:03:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 07:03:45 +0100 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] pinctrl: intel: Refactor intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges() to make it shorter Message-ID: <20260319060345.GQ2275908@black.igk.intel.com> References: <20260318151256.2590375-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20260318151256.2590375-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260318151256.2590375-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 04:10:18PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Refactor intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges() to make it shorter in binary > and source formats. > > Function old new delta > intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges 219 215 -4 > Total: Before=15522, After=15518, chg -0.03% Well if you enable optimization the compiler probably puts this into register and you don't see any changes here. Also code-wise this is neglible IMHO.