public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	longman@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Minor improvements while triggering idle load balance
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:23:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319065314.343932-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

While reading the code, noticed that I hadn't updated the comments
around nohz.nr_cpus which are stale now. While going through that code
again, saw these minor improvements that could be done. Since these are
fastpaths, even a little would help.

No functional change intended. It would help a bit when one runs with nohz_full.

The old code would bail out in find_new_ilb() when no eligible housekeeping idle 
CPU exists; this one just avoids doing the extra checks by making the same
decision earlier.

It is quite difficult to accurately predict that dance nohz.next_balance
and nohz.next_blocked, So do the same check for both. Avoid the
duplication if set already. Didn't see a better way.

Shrikanth Hegde (2):
  sched/fair: consider hk_mask early in triggering ilb
  sched/fair: get this cpu once in find_new_ilb

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19  6:53 Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-03-19  6:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: consider hk_mask early in triggering ilb Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-19  8:15   ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-03-19 13:13     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-19 22:58   ` Shubhang Kaushik
2026-03-20  2:47     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-20  3:37   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-20  9:19     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-20 11:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 14:12         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-20 14:28           ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-19  6:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: get this cpu once in find_new_ilb Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-19  8:18   ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-03-19  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-19 13:03     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-19 13:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20  3:40   ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260319065314.343932-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox