From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: [patch v2 11/11] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:25:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319231239.882002347@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20260319225224.853416463@kernel.org
When the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK mechanism is used for unlocking (PI-)futexes,
then the unlock sequence in userspace looks like this:
1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex);
2) robust_list_remove(mutex);
lval = gettid();
3) if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mutex->lock, lval, 0))
4) robust_list_clear_op_pending();
else
5) sys_futex(OP,...FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK);
That still leaves a minimal race window between #3 and #4 where the mutex
could be acquired by some other task which observes that it is the last
user and:
1) unmaps the mutex memory
2) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address
When then the original task exits before reaching #5 then the kernel robust
list handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space.
In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread
at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in
that memory and therefore corrupt unrelated data.
Provide a VDSO function which exposes the critical section window in the
VDSO symbol table. The resulting addresses are updated in the task's mm
when the VDSO is (re)map()'ed.
The core code detects when a task was interrupted within the critical
section and is about to deliver a signal. It then invokes an architecture
specific function which determines whether the pending op pointer has to be
cleared or not. The unlock assembly sequence on 64-bit is:
mov %esi,%eax // Load TID into EAX
xor %ecx,%ecx // Set ECX to 0
lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%rdi) // Try the TID -> 0 transition
.Lstart:
jnz .Lend
movq %rcx,(%rdx) // Clear list_op_pending
.Lend:
ret
So the decision can be simply based on the ZF state in regs->flags. The
pending op pointer is always in DX independent of the build mode
(32/64-bit) to make the pending op pointer retrieval uniform. The size of
the pointer is stored in the matching criticial section range struct and
the core code retrieves it from there. So the pointer retrieval function
does not have to care. It is bit-size independent:
return regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ? regs->dx : NULL;
There are two entry points to handle the different robust list pending op
pointer size:
__vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock()
__vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock()
The 32-bit VDSO provides only __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock().
The 64-bit VDSO provides always __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock() and
when COMPAT is enabled also the list32 variant, which is required to
support multi-size robust list pointers used by gaming emulators.
The unlock function is inspired by an idea from Mathieu Desnoyers.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260311185409.1988269-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
--
V2: Provide different entry points - Florian
Use __u32 and __x86_64__ - Thomas
Use private labels - Thomas
Optimize assembly - Uros
Split the functions up now that ranges are supported in the core and
document the actual assembly.
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1
arch/x86/entry/vdso/common/vfutex.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/Makefile | 5 +-
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S | 3 +
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vfutex.c | 1
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/Makefile | 7 +-
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdso64.lds.S | 4 +
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdsox32.lds.S | 4 +
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vfutex.c | 1
arch/x86/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 19 +++++++
10 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ config X86
select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
select HAVE_EISA if X86_32
select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
+ select HAVE_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
select HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS
select HAVE_GUP_FAST
select HAVE_FENTRY if X86_64 || DYNAMIC_FTRACE
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/common/vfutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <vdso/futex.h>
+
+/*
+ * Assembly template for the try unlock functions. The basic functionality is:
+ *
+ * mov esi, %eax Move the TID into EAX
+ * xor %ecx, %ecx Clear ECX
+ * lock_cmpxchgl %ecx, (%rdi) Attempt the TID -> 0 transition
+ * .Lcs_start: Start of the critical section
+ * jnz .Lcs_end If cmpxchl failed jump to the end
+ * .Lcs_success: Start of the success section
+ * movq %rcx, (%rdx) Set the pending op pointer to 0
+ * .Lcs_end: End of the critical section
+ *
+ * .Lcs_start and .Lcs_end establish the critical section range. .Lcs_success is
+ * technically not required, but there for illustration, debugging and testing.
+ *
+ * When CONFIG_COMPAT is enabled then the 64-bit VDSO provides two functions.
+ * One for the regular 64-bit sized pending operation pointer and one for a
+ * 32-bit sized pointer to support gaming emulators.
+ *
+ * The 32-bit VDSO provides only the one for 32-bit sized pointers.
+ */
+#define __stringify_1(x...) #x
+#define __stringify(x...) __stringify_1(x)
+
+#define LABEL(name, which) __stringify(name##_futex_try_unlock_cs_##which:)
+
+#define JNZ_END(name) "jnz " __stringify(name) "_futex_try_unlock_cs_end\n"
+
+#define CLEAR_POPQ "movq %[zero], %a[pop]\n"
+#define CLEAR_POPL "movl %k[zero], %a[pop]\n"
+
+#define futex_robust_try_unlock(name, clear_pop, __lock, __tid, __pop) \
+({ \
+ asm volatile ( \
+ " \n" \
+ " lock cmpxchgl %k[zero], %a[lock] \n" \
+ " \n" \
+ LABEL(name, start) \
+ " \n" \
+ JNZ_END(name) \
+ " \n" \
+ LABEL(name, success) \
+ " \n" \
+ clear_pop \
+ " \n" \
+ LABEL(name, end) \
+ : [tid] "+&a" (__tid) \
+ : [lock] "D" (__lock), \
+ [pop] "d" (__pop), \
+ [zero] "S" (0UL) \
+ : "memory" \
+ ); \
+ __tid; \
+})
+
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u64 *pop)
+{
+ return futex_robust_try_unlock(x86_64, CLEAR_POPQ, lock, tid, pop);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u32 *pop)
+{
+ return futex_robust_try_unlock(x86_64_compat, CLEAR_POPL, lock, tid, pop);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
+#else /* __x86_64__ */
+__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u32 *pop)
+{
+ return futex_robust_try_unlock(x86_32, CLEAR_POPL, lock, tid, pop);
+}
+#endif /* !__x86_64__ */
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/Makefile
@@ -7,8 +7,9 @@
vdsos-y := 32
# Files to link into the vDSO:
-vobjs-y := note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
-vobjs-y += system_call.o sigreturn.o
+vobjs-y := note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
+vobjs-y += system_call.o sigreturn.o
+vobjs-$(CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK) += vfutex.o
# Compilation flags
flags-y := -DBUILD_VDSO32 -m32 -mregparm=0
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ VERSION
__vdso_clock_gettime64;
__vdso_clock_getres_time64;
__vdso_getcpu;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
+ __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock;
+#endif
};
LINUX_2.5 {
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vfutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+#include "common/vfutex.c"
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/Makefile
@@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ vdsos-y := 64
vdsos-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += x32
# Files to link into the vDSO:
-vobjs-y := note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
-vobjs-y += vgetrandom.o vgetrandom-chacha.o
-vobjs-$(CONFIG_X86_SGX) += vsgx.o
+vobjs-y := note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
+vobjs-y += vgetrandom.o vgetrandom-chacha.o
+vobjs-$(CONFIG_X86_SGX) += vsgx.o
+vobjs-$(CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK) += vfutex.o
# Compilation flags
flags-y := -DBUILD_VDSO64 -m64 -mcmodel=small
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdso64.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdso64.lds.S
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ VERSION {
#endif
getrandom;
__vdso_getrandom;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
+ __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock;
+ __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock;
+#endif
local: *;
};
}
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdsox32.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vdsox32.lds.S
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ VERSION {
__vdso_getcpu;
__vdso_time;
__vdso_clock_getres;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
+ __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock;
+ __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock;
+#endif
local: *;
};
}
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64/vfutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+#include "common/vfutex.c"
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/futex_robust.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_X86_FUTEX_ROBUST_H
+#define _ASM_X86_FUTEX_ROBUST_H
+
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+
+static __always_inline void __user *x86_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /*
+ * If ZF is set then the cmpxchg succeeded and the pending op pointer
+ * needs to be cleared.
+ */
+ return regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ? (void __user *)regs->dx : NULL;
+}
+
+#define arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(regs) \
+ x86_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(regs)
+
+#endif /* _ASM_X86_FUTEX_ROBUST_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 23:24 [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 01/11] futex: Move futex task related data into a struct Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 14:59 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 02/11] futex: Move futex related mm_struct " Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:00 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 03/11] futex: Provide UABI defines for robust list entry modifiers Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 15:01 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 04/11] uaccess: Provide unsafe_atomic_store_release_user() Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:07 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 05/11] x86: Select ARCH_STORE_IMPLIES_RELEASE Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:08 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 06/11] futex: Cleanup UAPI defines Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 16:09 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 07/11] futex: Add support for unlocking robust futexes Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 17:14 ` André Almeida
2026-03-26 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 0:48 ` André Almeida
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 08/11] futex: Add robust futex unlock IP range Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-20 12:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 13:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-27 16:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 09/11] futex: Provide infrastructure to plug the non contended robust futex unlock race Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-20 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:24 ` [patch v2 10/11] x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-19 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-03-20 7:14 ` [patch v2 11/11] x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Uros Bizjak
2026-03-20 12:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 21:59 ` [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-26 22:08 ` Rich Felker
2026-03-27 3:42 ` André Almeida
2026-03-27 10:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-03-27 16:50 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260319231239.882002347@kernel.org \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=triegel@redhat.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox