From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, leitao@debian.org,
pmladek@suse.com, kernel-team@meta.com, puranjay@kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix false positive stall reports
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:23:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260320192332.1726079-1-song@kernel.org> (raw)
On weakly ordered architectures (e.g., arm64), the lockless check in
wq_watchdog_timer_fn() can observe a reordering between the worklist
insertion and the last_progress_ts update. Specifically, the watchdog
can see a non-empty worklist (from a list_add) while reading a stale
last_progress_ts value, causing a false positive stall report.
This was confirmed by reading pool->last_progress_ts again after holding
pool->lock in wq_watchdog_timer_fn():
workqueue watchdog: pool 7 false positive detected!
lockless_ts=4784580465 locked_ts=4785033728
diff=453263ms worklist_empty=0
To avoid slowing down the hot path (queue_work, etc.), recheck
last_progress_ts with pool->lock held. This will eliminate the false
positive with minimal overhead.
Remove two extra empty lines in wq_watchdog_timer_fn() as we are on it.
Assisted-by: claude-code:claude-opus-4-6
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b77119d71641..5b501ff1223a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -7701,6 +7701,23 @@ static void wq_watchdog_timer_fn(struct timer_list *unused)
/* did we stall? */
if (time_after(now, ts + thresh)) {
+ unsigned long irq_flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, irq_flags);
+ /*
+ * Recheck last_progress_ts with pool->lock, this
+ * eliminates false positive where we report wq
+ * stall for newly queued work.
+ */
+ pool_ts = READ_ONCE(pool->last_progress_ts);
+ if (time_after(pool_ts, touched))
+ ts = pool_ts;
+ else
+ ts = touched;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, irq_flags);
+ if (!time_after(now, ts + thresh))
+ continue;
+
lockup_detected = true;
stall_time = jiffies_to_msecs(now - pool_ts) / 1000;
max_stall_time = max(max_stall_time, stall_time);
@@ -7712,8 +7729,6 @@ static void wq_watchdog_timer_fn(struct timer_list *unused)
pr_cont_pool_info(pool);
pr_cont(" stuck for %us!\n", stall_time);
}
-
-
}
if (lockup_detected)
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 19:23 Song Liu [this message]
2026-03-21 18:27 ` [PATCH] workqueue: Fix false positive stall reports Tejun Heo
2026-03-23 9:35 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260320192332.1726079-1-song@kernel.org \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox