public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/crypto: sha1: Explicitly specify alignment of sha1_ctx::buf
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 22:59:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260321055917.GA2346@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320231403.47323-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> __sha1_final() writes a __be64 to &ctx->buf[56] using a plain write.
> That assumes that the alignment of buf is at least that of __be64.  It
> is, since it immediately follows a u64 field.  However, to make this
> assumption explicit it's best to specify the field alignment explicitly
> too, like what is done in the corresponding SHA-2 and MD5 structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/crypto/sha1.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/crypto/sha1.h b/include/crypto/sha1.h
> index 4d973e016cd6..560ed4fd1703 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/sha1.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/sha1.h
> @@ -38,11 +38,11 @@ struct sha1_block_state {
>   * @buf: partial block buffer; bytecount % SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE bytes are valid
>   */
>  struct sha1_ctx {
>  	struct sha1_block_state state;
>  	u64 bytecount;
> -	u8 buf[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE];
> +	u8 buf[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE] __aligned(__alignof__(__be64));
>  };

Surprisingly, this patch actually breaks the build on 32-bit x86.  The
static assertions in crypto/sha1.c that verify the consistency of
'struct sha1_ctx' and 'struct sha1_state' start failing.  gcc puts
bytecount and buf at offsets 20 and 28 in the struct.  I.e., it puts the
u64 field on only a 4-byte boundary.  However, __alignof__(__be64)
actually returns 8, causing the offset of buf to change from 28 to 32.
(The result is the same if __alignof__(u64) is used instead.)

Apparently __alignof__ returns the "preferred alignment".  But what we
want is "minimum alignment".  Which is C11's _Alignof, which was
deprecated in C23 and replaced with "alignof".  Sigh.

Probably best to just keep this as-is until we can get drivers/crypto/
migrated off of 'struct sha1_state' and remove that.

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-20 23:14 [PATCH] lib/crypto: sha1: Explicitly specify alignment of sha1_ctx::buf Eric Biggers
2026-03-21  5:59 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260321055917.GA2346@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox