public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kotaranov@microsoft.com, shirazsaleem@microsoft.com,
	longli@microsoft.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3 1/1] RDMA/mana: Provide a modern CQ creation interface
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 16:01:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260322140101.GA814676@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318175455.1419129-1-kotaranov@linux.microsoft.com>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 10:54:55AM -0700, Konstantin Taranov wrote:
> From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>
> 
> The uverbs CQ creation UAPI allows users to supply their own umem for a CQ.
> Create cq->umem if it was not created and use it to create a mana queue.
> The created umem is owned by IB/core and will be deallocated by IB/core.
> 
> To support RDMA objects that own umem, introduce mana_ib_create_queue_with_umem()
> to use the umem provided by the caller and do not de-allocate umem if it was allocted
> by the caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>
> ---
> v3: Make umem allocation explicit for cq->umem and use a new helper to create mana queue from it.
>     Remove the universal helper that was added in v2
> v2: Rework of Leon's commit. Introduce univesal helper that returned ownership of umem to caller.
>     Added removed u32 overlow check for kernel cq.
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/cq.c      | 131 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c  |   1 +
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/main.c    |  27 +++---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mana_ib.h |   5 +-
>  4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

<...>

> +int mana_ib_create_queue_from_umem(struct mana_ib_dev *mdev, struct ib_umem *umem,
> +				   struct mana_ib_queue *queue)
> +{
> +	queue->umem = NULL;

Two things. First, I'm waiting for Jason to converge on this  
ib_copy_*() work. Second, I still believe drivers should not cache  
umem.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-22 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 17:54 [PATCH rdma-next v3 1/1] RDMA/mana: Provide a modern CQ creation interface Konstantin Taranov
2026-03-22 14:01 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-03-25 10:29   ` [EXTERNAL] " Konstantin Taranov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260322140101.GA814676@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kotaranov@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kotaranov@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=shirazsaleem@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox