Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx-rproc: Introduce fsl,reset-vector-mask

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 08:36:56PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Cortex-M[7,33] processors use a fixed reset vector table format:
> 
>   0x00  Initial SP value
>   0x04  Reset vector
>   0x08  NMI
>   0x0C  ...
>   ...
>   IRQ[n]
> 
> In ELF images, the corresponding layout is:
> 
> reset_vectors:  --> hardware reset address
>         .word __stack_end__
>         .word Reset_Handler
>         .word NMI_Handler
>         .word HardFault_Handler
>         ...
>         .word UART_IRQHandler
>         .word SPI_IRQHandler
>         ...
> 
> Reset_Handler:  --> ELF entry point address
>         ...
> 
> The hardware fetches the first two words from reset_vectors and populates
> SP with __stack_end__ and PC with Reset_Handler. Execution proceeds from
> Reset_Handler.
> 
> However, the ELF entry point does not always match the hardware reset
> address. For example, on i.MX94 CM33S:
> 
>   ELF entry point:           0x0ffc211d
>   CM33S hardware reset base: 0x0ffc0000
> 
> To derive the correct hardware reset address, the unused lower bits must
> be masked off. The boot code should apply a SoC‑specific mask before
> programming the reset address registers, e.g.:
> 
>   reset_address = entry & reset-vector-mask
> 
> This reset address derivation method is also applicable to i.MX8M
> Cortex-M7/4 cores.
> 
> Introduces the optional DT property `fsl,reset-vector-mask` to specify the
> mask used for deriving the hardware reset address from
> the ELF entry point.

Why can't you fix the ELF image to have the right address?

Or just imply the reset address from the compatible? It's fixed per SoC, 
right?

Rob