From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4571635C1A1; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774343842; cv=none; b=LLVf7HJ5c7LXO/M9yvkf5D/gQL2wLxffNrUGQ5A1xi73g2WuL7E1Fhaqv+73E0P8svHWJowPJta99R9tWBcUObc0Er1xYls2pX0b/U5bUurQIwL7xqlwMnUE0rDMbvZzySZx7lcpPr4eA9melwGJhpkNQuTf3uhFEBm3agD9lj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774343842; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cV7PXfmrxmLcVjKof3XYRFXjW8AtEWzy6Da9eHYlAaw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hn7TnaKfE1BLN6cPH2UAeZQqgCXLDFhoQr2jBuzKGtWx89URetXXVKmXIEQJ24Wa43RlBcRkFT2Fh6GfZkRAcJL7f6OfhPqcldi5R+tkssTMaZHxJVv9F3Gu4VRwz26Ao/bAAkz/8UbX+Ebn5MmCfhSSoHFU6gpwCqEjSiBuIS0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=DpaZp5q0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="DpaZp5q0" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F4A1A2FBD; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC076011D; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id DD50910451116; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:17:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1774343832; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=BHr9PdVOTllydeZaE1ifeiHaaJ9aVptu2pB5+NjGvtI=; b=DpaZp5q02KyO9ERHly+i7WQ/zatgPecrFTcY4+CDACZgRlEsPCgy2FR4oRdUg2rnqDGi7E 4WTni88R8PcYKSGgqR1sg3l3q7SvMA0GmWt2OXrhrHLwLdigxjrtAlnBjyHsZtL4pOdzvc GfbFIeADpRMCrUliPbnbBZd25fFN+llKcVfigpR54M0xIpNyepyPcLBIMfXbgV+NkjAylJ 82AIFDGQKDtlA6IkRmacJ6qcGgRzcJVv/fbGcHRpnC0eFAWGkVrJAtn7YdKYR54IA6YC6f A08NeQNGO8csqcdFpz223aawrkHDiNve4Nk/PuzvFykr+yR0GjtGS3Pzi6WmVA== Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:17:07 +0100 From: Herve Codina To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add #address-cells in the GIC node Message-ID: <20260324101707.7d1011cf@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20260303102029.147359-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hi Wolfram, On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:32:53 +0100 Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 11:20:29AM +0100, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) wrote: > > When checking dts involving the r9a06g032.dtsi file, the following kind > > of warnings are reported: > > Missing property '#address-cells' in node xxx, using 0 as fallback > > > > Indeed, #address-cells is not present in the GIC interrupt controller > > node. > > > > Fix it adding the missing property. > > > > No functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang > > I like Krzysztof's explanation "Value '0' is correct because GIC > interrupt controller does not have children." Maybe it can be added to > the commit message? > I will update the commit log on the v2 iteration. Should I keep your reviewed-by tag for this v2. Indeed, you don't have seen yet the new commit log :) Best regards, Hervé -- Hervé Codina, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com