From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF31938423C; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774377306; cv=none; b=rQJMLr8xRKNKq28qyuXKzfD/eYXAW0S5nMKqj1tl9rcPCGOSDaBeocqxadkyNy3BWIM6mPESYMIcARVF1zviWs11wUaFdhkEjfed0wjGAoIirMGm4rL26JM7PunfVAuJkbqS6oL/r8Gi/crSxb7UvrnEzZG+05aTtQFbK7HhOxM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774377306; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3mtnNrWs7NVLaSpyjfBfDkRiPq2NuFpzWPSxxsmseg4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TRJX/1kOXHuh+Pr2szd6qQs3fRBTASGdyt7eGDLGeDAcEi/GK/BJmhw8yzREqdhHyV1AOmJ6urcZ9o1/7v6eR1yskmKdVnssrf2nc4Vsw+rkoypTw83L89NjGQ5ZOj1NdlgTWx3OXBZmu5JsEzK617tlK+BXdMVhqL6UfdypzHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ShRHU68p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ShRHU68p" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A50E3C19424; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:35:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774377306; bh=3mtnNrWs7NVLaSpyjfBfDkRiPq2NuFpzWPSxxsmseg4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ShRHU68ptBW0OeMmkoNE6B59UtRu4BWo7CrSi2kc3enumnRIoT5vqzd/14etWExC3 O3kfcGEVq59qFPVdn8tatrBwL+gOtsmp/1znRSauf16l9KdKuaZE8HOyGHI1RbDY6s I5K0FLUVY6L42sbhOT3v2TqNU3FkzLQnpwU5bkDbZH1Pyj6RGDq4ye1lfBs8JIu+vl luNfBjAfk/0GQyNzKnBY8noj5IZjckMvCiUtYXjmvaB0gr6s9JEHfnL8he3Qhg/5cA r0afUGiBPhEoHQVwQ3PdSgQPKbBAYn5HrOX+1v1h3YV3N0XqZDMQjreS3us6Mpx4Qi /L9VvT396wZRg== Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:35:01 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Schier , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Nick Huang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install.sh: Normalize __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ Message-ID: <20260324183501.GA3704429@ax162> References: <20260309-uapi-assembly-v1-1-a7ebfbf14309@weissschuh.net> <20260313235618.GA4171564@ax162> <3d6608fe-be15-497a-85a3-e6af2dbded0a@t-8ch.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3d6608fe-be15-497a-85a3-e6af2dbded0a@t-8ch.de> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2026-03-13 16:56:18-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > It sounds like the "< GCC 3.0" part of that might not be true based on > > Maciej's research? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/alpine.DEB.2.21.2603101412520.63708@angie.orcam.me.uk/ > > Yes, indeed. In my opinion the consistency aspect is still sufficient > to have this change. What do you think? Yes, I think so. Will you keep it as going from __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__? It probably makes more sense that way given there should be no regressions on the compiler side and that is the intended end result? Cheers, Nathan