Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] lib/vsprintf: Fixes size check

[David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:04:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:25:06 +0900 "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Here is the 4th version of patches to fix vsnprintf().
> > 
> >  - Fix to limit the size of width and precision.
> >  - Warn if the return size is over INT_MAX.
> > 
> > Previous version is here;
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/177410406326.38798.16853803119128725972.stgit@devnote2/
> > 
> > In this version, do clamp() the width and precision before checking it and
> > accept negative precision[1/3] and add Petr's Reviewed-by[2/2].  
> 
> AI review has flagged a couple of possible issues:
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/177440550682.147866.1854734911195480940.stgit@devnote2

I'd guess there are exactly 0 places where a negative precision is passed
to "%.*s" - if there were any someone would have complained about the
output being missing.
Checking all 759 cases grep -r '".*%.*\.%*s.*"' found will be tedious.
But pretty much all are 'namelen'.

In any case worst thing should be a panic if the code hits an invalid
address before finding a '\0' byte - probably unlikely anyway.

I'd fix it, but try to stop it being backported.

	David