Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add support MT6316/6363/MT6373 PMICs regulators and MFD

[Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>]

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 10:01:56AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 06/11/25 17:11, Lee Jones ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > 
> > > Changes in v11:
> > >   - Removed unnecessary #address-cells in all mt6316 bindings
> > > 
> > > Changes in v10:
> > >   - Added "struct" prefix to structs kerneldoc
> > >   - Renamed struct mtk_spmi_pmic_pdata to mtk_spmi_pmic_variant
> > >   - Added "REG_" to MT6363/73 mfd register definitions to disambiguate
> > >   - Expanded MTK_SPMI_PMIC_IRQ_GROUP macro parameter names as suggested
> > >   - Some rewording of comments as suggested, addition of more comments
> > >   - Refactored IRQ domain handling due to deprecation of function
> > >     irq_domain_add_tree() to use the new irq_domain_create_tree()
> > >   - Fixed to use generic_handle_domain_irq_safe() to avoid races
> > >   - Added support for two interrupt cells in translation
> > >   - Removed .irq_lock() and .irq_unlock() in favor of lockdep classes
> > >   - Added support for handling PMICs without IRQ Group register for
> > >     upcoming MT6685 implementation
> > 
> > The MFD part looks okay.
> > 
> > Let me know when you have all the Acks and the set is ready to be merged.
> > 
> 
> 
> Lee, the regulators part was picked by Mark, so I guess you can take the MFD part
> through your tree.
> 
> I'm not sure if you can also take patch [7/9] (auxadc binding), but it would be
> great if you could, because there is an auxadc example in the mfd binding that
> needs that commit in order to succeed the binding check.

Friendly ping. You might want to resend the remaining patches. Looks
like they are all ready to be merged?


ChenYu