public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: forbid multiple entries with the same symbol in a choice
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330141417.GA1990358@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330115736.1559962-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 08:57:35PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Commit 6a859f1a19d1 ("powerpc: unify two CONFIG_POWERPC64_CPU entries
> in the same choice block") removed the only occurrence of this tricky
> use case.
> 
> Disallow this pattern in choice_check_sanity() and revert commit
> 4d46b5b623e0 ("kconfig: fix infinite loop in sym_calc_choice()").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

Yeah, definitely seems like a reasonable restriction.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

> ---
> 
>  scripts/kconfig/parser.y | 15 ++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/parser.y b/scripts/kconfig/parser.y
> index 6d1bbee38f5d..5fb6f07b6ad2 100644
> --- a/scripts/kconfig/parser.y
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/parser.y
> @@ -159,14 +159,8 @@ config_stmt: config_entry_start config_option_list
>  			yynerrs++;
>  		}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * If the same symbol appears twice in a choice block, the list
> -		 * node would be added twice, leading to a broken linked list.
> -		 * list_empty() ensures that this symbol has not yet added.
> -		 */
> -		if (list_empty(&current_entry->sym->choice_link))
> -			list_add_tail(&current_entry->sym->choice_link,
> -				      &current_choice->choice_members);
> +		list_add_tail(&current_entry->sym->choice_link,
> +			      &current_choice->choice_members);
>  	}
>  
>  	printd(DEBUG_PARSE, "%s:%d:endconfig\n", cur_filename, cur_lineno);
> @@ -546,11 +540,10 @@ static int choice_check_sanity(const struct menu *menu)
>  			ret = -1;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (prop->menu != menu && prop->type == P_PROMPT &&
> -		    prop->menu->parent != menu->parent) {
> +		if (prop->menu != menu && prop->type == P_PROMPT) {
>  			fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d: error: %s",
>  				prop->filename, prop->lineno,
> -				"choice value has a prompt outside its choice group\n");
> +				"choice value must not have a prompt in another entry\n");
>  			ret = -1;
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-30 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-30 11:57 [PATCH] kconfig: forbid multiple entries with the same symbol in a choice Masahiro Yamada
2026-03-30 14:14 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-04-03 19:15 ` Nicolas Schier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260330141417.GA1990358@ax162 \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox