From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A541891A9; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 00:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775090999; cv=none; b=ecYzDWVNhRIwqkihcEsTBhl9nfrn3Z8iDEdn+5i/72DSwRrrfLyVZMaatFeX8PeUyX7aHbVXePvvHObAhDIGjWASUxZYxtlGeuv3wr3zXMIyOqBLKIXEWPvbN1f6eV8ko/yVm33vfQez3bKU9psbkGVUukVybTIXwlMec6SU0us= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775090999; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jjc/fLoZs5Ki0ribTW+wFhCq+oTJbcdiP+szOIm3u14=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kuFpj1V9poL67vefDRg12gGflBGSSD7SQKVb65XPMacFUwhQpGP1Egd4mQxoGkntOV3auNFZVICIiN39na3BtRHvKCwq6f3ujke4pVS3XRxspSZJM0mGzi2ti4TvvWx39K/a3ba5XO5swhj7Q3I3PJmCqtOPAQUOiJgnkwyzzG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VKtyrqwL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VKtyrqwL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53F97C4CEF7; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 00:49:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775090999; bh=jjc/fLoZs5Ki0ribTW+wFhCq+oTJbcdiP+szOIm3u14=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VKtyrqwLu9c+418UDa9Nizrr35Mvvx1oZQUMC+dAFUXX1mE5ER8GLh8/xh5UM0utj l2ZtLSpNQx1Dd77/iv/qW7A2TSbxC4KixLAG8r+RDmlcLMl9BiycSncchTCVM7aC3D E/NJG+wUVuHkINFWScspI2TBJ4HMgnIsTiRZZmUJ4wy95aJySrc2AdUaeG/2lamj6q MKb7HyKU3r7e9+EgboSVgOR7m6ghujSvJfWG72sgFz6lbvtwLh2/j1ZnFazjx+LcJc o88hJ7XiFrGeZdswYlbxzk5slsaE0HicbAIUKsDl67NvQrWymoepyu/O24jVJsrrJ0 ZMjqIHdKLQXRA== Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 17:49:56 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Hangbin Liu Cc: Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] ethtool: strset: check nla_len overflow before nla_nest_end Message-ID: <20260401174956.1e526940@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260331-b4-ynl_ethtool-v1-0-dda2a9b55df8@gmail.com> <20260331-b4-ynl_ethtool-v1-3-dda2a9b55df8@gmail.com> <20260331184637.58b968ef@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 07:27:40 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 06:46:37PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:56:13 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > > + if (skb_tail_pointer(skb) - (unsigned char *)strings_attr > U16_MAX) > > > + goto nla_put_failure; > > > > bit ugly, let's add a variant of nla_nest_end() which can return > > an error on overflow (without the warning from patch 4) ? > > I was tried to not touch nla_nest_end() as it is used everywhere. But it makes > sense to me to add a new function to check this. I'm not very good at naming, > maybe `nla_nest_end_validate()` ? Or any other name if you have? I was thinking nla_nest_end_check() to match the __must_check attribute. But I also like nla_nest_end_safe() _validate() is a little long but anything <=5 chars is fine.