From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>, Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: [patch V5 09/15] genirq/manage: Make NMI cleanup RT safe
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 23:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401201348.628060046@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20260401195625.213446764@kernel.org
Eventually blocking functions cannot be invoked with interrupts disabled
and a raw spin lock held. Restructure the code so this happens outside of
the descriptor lock held region.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
---
V4: New patch. Found when adding the validation update to it
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -2026,24 +2026,30 @@ const void *free_irq(unsigned int irq, v
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq);
-/* This function must be called with desc->lock held */
static const void *__cleanup_nmi(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
+ struct irqaction *action = NULL;
const char *devname = NULL;
- desc->istate &= ~IRQS_NMI;
+ scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &desc->lock) {
+ irq_nmi_teardown(desc);
- if (!WARN_ON(desc->action == NULL)) {
- irq_pm_remove_action(desc, desc->action);
- devname = desc->action->name;
- unregister_handler_proc(irq, desc->action);
+ desc->istate &= ~IRQS_NMI;
- kfree(desc->action);
+ if (!WARN_ON(desc->action == NULL)) {
+ action = desc->action;
+ irq_pm_remove_action(desc, action);
+ devname = action->name;
+ }
desc->action = NULL;
+
+ irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
+ irq_shutdown_and_deactivate(desc);
}
- irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
- irq_shutdown_and_deactivate(desc);
+ if (action)
+ unregister_handler_proc(irq, action);
+ kfree(action);
irq_release_resources(desc);
@@ -2067,8 +2073,6 @@ const void *free_nmi(unsigned int irq, v
if (WARN_ON(desc->depth == 0))
disable_nmi_nosync(irq);
- guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&desc->lock);
- irq_nmi_teardown(desc);
return __cleanup_nmi(irq, desc);
}
@@ -2318,13 +2322,14 @@ int request_nmi(unsigned int irq, irq_ha
/* Setup NMI state */
desc->istate |= IRQS_NMI;
retval = irq_nmi_setup(desc);
- if (retval) {
- __cleanup_nmi(irq, desc);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- return 0;
}
+ if (retval) {
+ __cleanup_nmi(irq, desc);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return 0;
+
err_irq_setup:
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
err_out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 21:51 [patch V5 00/15] Improve /proc/interrupts further Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:51 ` [patch V5 01/15] x86/irq: Optimize interrupts decimals printing Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:51 ` [patch V5 02/15] genirq/proc: Avoid formatting zero counts in /proc/interrupts Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:51 ` [patch V5 03/15] genirq/proc: Utilize irq_desc::tot_count to avoid evaluation Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:51 ` [patch V5 04/15] x86/irq: Make irqstats array based Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:51 ` [patch V5 05/15] x86/irq: Suppress unlikely interrupt stats by default Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-02 16:39 ` Radu Rendec
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 06/15] x86/irq: Move IOAPIC misrouted and PIC/APIC error counts into irq_stats Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-02 16:41 ` Radu Rendec
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 07/15] scripts/gdb: Update x86 interrupts to the array based storage Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-02 17:11 ` Radu Rendec
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 08/15] genirq: Expose nr_irqs in core code Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 10/15] genirq: Cache the condition for /proc/interrupts exposure Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-02 17:27 ` Radu Rendec
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 11/15] genirq: Calculate precision only when required Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 12/15] genirq: Add rcuref count to struct irq_desc Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 13/15] genirq: Expose irq_find_desc_at_or_after() in core code Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 14/15] genirq/proc: Runtime size the chip name Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [patch V5 15/15] genirq/proc: Speed up /proc/interrupts iteration Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-02 2:32 ` [patch V5 00/15] Improve /proc/interrupts further Michael Kelley
2026-04-02 13:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260401201348.628060046@kernel.org \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox