From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: tariqt@nvidia.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, saeedm@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com,
leon@kernel.org, shayd@nvidia.com, horms@kernel.org,
kees@kernel.org, parav@nvidia.com, phaddad@nvidia.com,
gal@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] net/mlx5: SD, Keep multi-pf debugfs entries on primary
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 20:09:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402030911.878500-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330193412.53408-3-tariqt@nvidia.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net/mlx5: SD, Keep multi-pf debugfs entries on primary
This commit fixes an issue where the "multi-pf" debugfs directory was stored
in the calling device's sd struct but created under the primary device's root.
It explicitly stores the debugfs dentry in the primary device's sd struct.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c
> index 060649645012..4c80b9d25283 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/sd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -491,6 +499,7 @@ void mlx5_sd_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> {
> struct mlx5_sd *sd = mlx5_get_sd(dev);
> struct mlx5_core_dev *primary, *pos;
> + struct mlx5_sd *primary_sd;
> int i;
>
> if (!sd)
> @@ -500,10 +509,12 @@ void mlx5_sd_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> goto out;
>
> primary = mlx5_sd_get_primary(dev);
> + primary_sd = mlx5_get_sd(primary);
> mlx5_sd_for_each_secondary(i, primary, pos)
> sd_cmd_unset_secondary(pos);
> sd_cmd_unset_primary(primary);
> - debugfs_remove_recursive(sd->dfs);
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(primary_sd->dfs);
> + primary_sd->dfs = NULL;
Can concurrent unbind operations cause a use-after-free and double-free
regression here?
In mlx5_sd_cleanup(), the check !mlx5_devcom_comp_is_ready(sd->devcom) is
performed locklessly. If multiple physical functions in the Socket-Direct
group are unbound concurrently, multiple threads can observe ready == true
and enter this teardown block simultaneously.
Since the cleanup code now operates on the shared primary_sd pointer instead
of the local device's sd, the thread for the primary physical function might
complete its unbind and execute sd_cleanup(dev), freeing its sd object
(which is primary_sd).
Concurrently, the thread for a secondary physical function will dereference
the freed primary_sd to access primary_sd->dfs, causing a use-after-free.
Both threads could also pass the same pointer to debugfs_remove_recursive(),
resulting in a double-free.
Note: This was fixed later in the patch series by commit 92528cec4e0b91deb
("net/mlx5: SD: Serialize init/cleanup").
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 19:34 [PATCH net 0/3] net/mlx5: Fixes for Socket-Direct Tariq Toukan
2026-03-30 19:34 ` [PATCH net 1/3] net/mlx5e: SD, Fix race condition in secondary device probe/remove Tariq Toukan
2026-04-02 3:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-02 20:03 ` Shay Drori
2026-04-03 0:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-05 19:05 ` Shay Drori
2026-03-30 19:34 ` [PATCH net 2/3] net/mlx5: SD, Keep multi-pf debugfs entries on primary Tariq Toukan
2026-04-02 3:09 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-02 19:50 ` Shay Drori
2026-03-30 19:34 ` [PATCH net 3/3] net/mlx5: SD: Serialize init/cleanup Tariq Toukan
2026-04-02 3:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-02 19:49 ` Shay Drori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402030911.878500-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=phaddad@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox