From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Rename device_set_dirty_tracking() and pass dmar_domain pointer
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 14:57:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402065734.1687476-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402065734.1687476-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
device_set_dirty_tracking() sets dirty tracking on all devices attached to
a domain, also on all PASIDs attached to same domain in subsequent patch.
So rename it as domain_set_dirty_tracking() and pass dmar_domain pointer
to better align to what it does.
No functional changes intended.
Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260330101108.12594-3-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index ef7613b177b9..965e0330ec4b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -3684,16 +3684,15 @@ static void *intel_iommu_hw_info(struct device *dev, u32 *length,
return vtd;
}
-/*
- * Set dirty tracking for the device list of a domain. The caller must
- * hold the domain->lock when calling it.
- */
-static int device_set_dirty_tracking(struct list_head *devices, bool enable)
+/* Set dirty tracking for the devices that the domain has been attached. */
+static int domain_set_dirty_tracking(struct dmar_domain *domain, bool enable)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
int ret = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(info, devices, link) {
+ lockdep_assert_held(&domain->lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
ret = intel_pasid_setup_dirty_tracking(info->iommu, info->dev,
IOMMU_NO_PASID, enable);
if (ret)
@@ -3713,7 +3712,7 @@ static int parent_domain_set_dirty_tracking(struct dmar_domain *domain,
spin_lock(&domain->s1_lock);
list_for_each_entry(s1_domain, &domain->s1_domains, s2_link) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&s1_domain->lock, flags);
- ret = device_set_dirty_tracking(&s1_domain->devices, enable);
+ ret = domain_set_dirty_tracking(s1_domain, enable);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s1_domain->lock, flags);
if (ret)
goto err_unwind;
@@ -3724,8 +3723,7 @@ static int parent_domain_set_dirty_tracking(struct dmar_domain *domain,
err_unwind:
list_for_each_entry(s1_domain, &domain->s1_domains, s2_link) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&s1_domain->lock, flags);
- device_set_dirty_tracking(&s1_domain->devices,
- domain->dirty_tracking);
+ domain_set_dirty_tracking(s1_domain, domain->dirty_tracking);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s1_domain->lock, flags);
}
spin_unlock(&domain->s1_lock);
@@ -3742,7 +3740,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
if (dmar_domain->dirty_tracking == enable)
goto out_unlock;
- ret = device_set_dirty_tracking(&dmar_domain->devices, enable);
+ ret = domain_set_dirty_tracking(dmar_domain, enable);
if (ret)
goto err_unwind;
@@ -3759,8 +3757,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return 0;
err_unwind:
- device_set_dirty_tracking(&dmar_domain->devices,
- dmar_domain->dirty_tracking);
+ domain_set_dirty_tracking(dmar_domain, dmar_domain->dirty_tracking);
spin_unlock(&dmar_domain->lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 6:57 [PATCH 00/10] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v7.1 Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] iommu/vt-d: Block PASID attachment to nested domain with dirty tracking Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] iommu/vt-d: Support dirty tracking on PASID Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] iommufd/selftest: Test " Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_readl() and dmar_readq() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_writel() and dmar_writeq() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] iommu/vt-d: Split piotlb invalidation into range and all Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Pass size_order to qi_desc_piotlb() not npages Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Remove the remaining pages along the invalidation path Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 6:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Simplify calculate_psi_aligned_address() Lu Baolu
2026-04-02 8:39 ` Baolu Lu
2026-04-02 9:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2026-04-02 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-02 7:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v7.1 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402065734.1687476-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox