From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: fair: Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 15:42:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402134253.GG3558198@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331162352.551501-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 06:23:52PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Delayed dequeue feature aims to reduce the negative lag of a dequeued task
> while sleeping but it can happens that newly enqueued tasks will move
> backward the avg vruntime and increase its negative lag.
> When the delayed dequeued task wakes up, it has more neg lag compared to
> being dequeued immediately or to other tasks that have been dequeued just
> before theses new enqueues.
>
> Ensure that the negative lag of a delayed dequeued task doesn't increase
> during its delayed dequeued phase while waiting for its neg lag to
> diseappear. Similarly, we remove any positive lag that the delayed
> dequeued task could have gain during thsi period.
>
> Short slice tasks are particularly impacted in overloaded system.
>
> Test on snapdragon rb5:
>
> hackbench -T -p -l 16000000 -g 2 1> /dev/null &
> cyclictest -t 1 -i 2777 -D 333 --policy=fair --mlock -h 20000 -q
>
> The scheduling latency of cyclictest is:
>
> tip/sched/core tip/sched/core +this patch
> cyclictest slice (ms) (default)2.8 8 8
> hackbench slice (ms) (default)2.8 20 20
> Total Samples | 115632 119733 119806
> Average (us) | 364 64(-82%) 61(- 5%)
> Median (P50) (us) | 60 56(- 7%) 56( 0%)
> 90th Percentile (us) | 1166 62(-95%) 62( 0%)
> 99th Percentile (us) | 4192 73(-98%) 72(- 1%)
> 99.9th Percentile (us) | 8528 2707(-68%) 1300(-52%)
> Maximum (us) | 17735 14273(-20%) 13525(- 5%)
>
Anyway, I can confirm this works quite well. The latency-slice numbers
are far more stable now.
Thanks for digging into that!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 16:23 [PATCH v2] sched: fair: Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue Vincent Guittot
2026-04-02 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-02 13:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-02 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-04-02 19:27 ` Shubhang Kaushik
2026-04-03 8:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-04 8:08 ` Shubhang Kaushik
2026-04-03 8:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-03 12:30 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402134253.GG3558198@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox