From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: add poll-interval-ms property
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:51:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403135121.3309161-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330-spiritual-placid-jackal-cd4269@quoll>
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for the review.
The idea was to let boards tune the poll rate in case I2C bus load
matters, but you're right - that's a driver decision, not a hardware
property. The controller either has an IRQ or it doesn't, and how
often we poll is up to the driver.
I'll drop this patch and the of_property_read_u32() call in patch 2,
and just hardcode the 500ms default in the driver.
Does that work for you? Happy to send v4 with that change.
Thanks,
Carlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-29 15:31 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: pse-pd: add poll path and LED trigger support Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-29 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: add poll-interval-ms property Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-30 7:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-03 13:51 ` Carlo Szelinsky [this message]
2026-03-29 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: pse-pd: add devm_pse_poll_helper() Carlo Szelinsky
2026-03-29 15:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: pse-pd: add LED trigger support via notification path Carlo Szelinsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403135121.3309161-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox