From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, bijan311@gmail.com,
ajayjoshi@micron.com, honggyu.kim@sk.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] mm/damon: add node_eligible_mem_bp and node_ineligible_mem_bp goal metrics
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:53:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260404195330.85809-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404012215.1539-1-ravis.opensrc@gmail.com>
Hello Ravi,
On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:22:14 -0700 Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces two new DAMOS quota goal metrics for controlling
> memory distribution in heterogeneous memory systems (e.g., DRAM and CXL
> memory tiering) using physical address (PA) mode monitoring.
>
> Changes since v4:
> =================
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260320190453.1430-1-ravis.opensrc@gmail.com/
>
> - Fixed commit message description for DAMOS_QUOTA_NODE_INELIGIBLE_MEM_BP
> per review feedback
> - Added clarifying comment for ops-common.h include (for damon_get_folio())
> - Fixed build error when CONFIG_DAMON_PADDR is disabled by adding
> #ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_PADDR guards around functions using damon_get_folio()
> - Dropped RFC tag per maintainer feedback
Thank you for revisioning while addressing my comments on the previous version!
>
> This patch is based on top of damon/next.
Maybe because of this, sashiko was unable to review this.
To my understanding, there is no real reason to make this based on damon/next.
And I'd like to get sashiko review for this patch. Could you please rebase
this to latest mm-new and repost for that?
>
> Background and Motivation
> =========================
>
> In heterogeneous memory systems, controlling memory distribution across
> NUMA nodes is essential for performance optimization. This patch enables
> system-wide page distribution with target-state goals such as "maintain
> 30% of scheme-eligible memory on CXL" using PA-mode DAMON schemes.
[...]
Other than the lack of the sashiko review, this cover letter looks good to me.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-04 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-04 1:22 [PATCH v5 0/1] mm/damon: add node_eligible_mem_bp and node_ineligible_mem_bp goal metrics Ravi Jonnalagadda
2026-04-04 1:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Ravi Jonnalagadda
2026-04-04 20:01 ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-04 19:53 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260404195330.85809-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=ajayjoshi@micron.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bijan311@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ravis.opensrc@gmail.com \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox