From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for sock_ops ctx access with same src/dst register
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 11:12:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260406031330.187630-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406031330.187630-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Add selftests to verify SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() and SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD()
correctly return NULL/zero when dst_reg == src_reg and is_fullsock == 0.
Three subtests are included:
- get_sk: ctx->sk with same src/dst register (SOCK_OPS_GET_SK)
- get_field: ctx->snd_cwnd with same src/dst register (SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD)
- get_sk_diff_reg: ctx->sk with different src/dst register (baseline)
Each BPF program uses inline asm (__naked) to force specific register
allocation, reads is_fullsock first, then loads the field using the same
(or different) register. The test triggers TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV via a TCP
handshake and checks that the result is NULL/zero when is_fullsock == 0.
Test:
./test_progs -a sock_ops_get_sk -v
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:join_cgroup 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:skel_open_load 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:start_server 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:connect_to_fd 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:null_seen 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:bug_not_detected 0 nsec
#419/1 sock_ops_get_sk/get_sk:OK
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:start_server 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:connect_to_fd 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:field_null_seen 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:field_bug_not_detected 0 nsec
#419/2 sock_ops_get_sk/get_field:OK
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:start_server 0 nsec
run_sock_ops_test:PASS:connect_to_fd 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:diff_reg_null_seen 0 nsec
test_sock_ops_get_sk:PASS:diff_reg_bug_not_detected 0 nsec
#419/3 sock_ops_get_sk/get_sk_diff_reg:OK
#419 sock_ops_get_sk:OK
Summary: 1/3 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c | 77 ++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 194 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..e086f7abb197e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_ops_get_sk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "network_helpers.h"
+#include "sock_ops_get_sk.skel.h"
+
+/* See progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c for the bug description. */
+static void run_sock_ops_test(struct sock_ops_get_sk *skel, int cgroup_fd,
+ int prog_fd)
+{
+ int server_fd, client_fd, err;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_attach"))
+ return;
+
+ server_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(server_fd, 0, "start_server"))
+ goto detach;
+
+ /* Trigger TCP handshake which causes TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state where
+ * is_fullsock == 0 and is_locked_tcp_sock == 0.
+ */
+ client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(client_fd, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
+ goto close_server;
+
+ close(client_fd);
+
+close_server:
+ close(server_fd);
+detach:
+ bpf_prog_detach(cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
+}
+
+void test_sock_ops_get_sk(void)
+{
+ struct sock_ops_get_sk *skel;
+ int cgroup_fd;
+
+ cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/sock_ops_get_sk");
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
+ return;
+
+ skel = sock_ops_get_sk__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load"))
+ goto close_cgroup;
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_SK with same src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_sk")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(skel, cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_sk_same_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->null_seen, 1, "null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->bug_detected, 0, "bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD with same src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_field")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(skel, cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_field_same_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->field_null_seen, 1, "field_null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->field_bug_detected, 0, "field_bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ /* Test SOCK_OPS_GET_SK with different src/dst register */
+ if (test__start_subtest("get_sk_diff_reg")) {
+ run_sock_ops_test(skel, cgroup_fd,
+ bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.sock_ops_get_sk_diff_reg));
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->diff_reg_null_seen, 1, "diff_reg_null_seen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->diff_reg_bug_detected, 0, "diff_reg_bug_not_detected");
+ }
+
+ sock_ops_get_sk__destroy(skel);
+close_cgroup:
+ close(cgroup_fd);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..3a0689f8ce7ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_ops_get_sk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+/*
+ * Test the SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() and SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() macros in
+ * sock_ops_convert_ctx_access() when dst_reg == src_reg.
+ *
+ * When dst_reg == src_reg, the macros borrow a temporary register to load
+ * is_fullsock / is_locked_tcp_sock, because dst_reg holds the ctx pointer
+ * and cannot be clobbered before ctx->sk / ctx->field is read. If
+ * is_fullsock == 0 (e.g., TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV with a request_sock), the macro
+ * must still zero dst_reg so the verifier's PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL /
+ * SCALAR_VALUE type is correct at runtime. A missing clear leaves a stale
+ * ctx pointer in dst_reg that passes NULL checks (GET_SK) or leaks a kernel
+ * address as a scalar (GET_FIELD).
+ *
+ * When dst_reg != src_reg, dst_reg itself is used to load is_fullsock, so
+ * the JEQ (dst_reg == 0) naturally leaves it zeroed on the !fullsock path.
+ */
+
+int bug_detected;
+int null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_sk_same_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + %[sk_off]);"
+ "if r7 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r1 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[null_seen] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(sk_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk)),
+ __imm_addr(bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD: same-register, is_locked_tcp_sock == 0 path. */
+int field_bug_detected;
+int field_null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_field_same_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + %[snd_cwnd_off]);"
+ "if r7 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r1 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[field_bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[field_null_seen] ll;"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(snd_cwnd_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, snd_cwnd)),
+ __imm_addr(field_bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(field_null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* SOCK_OPS_GET_SK: different-register, is_fullsock == 0 path. */
+int diff_reg_bug_detected;
+int diff_reg_null_seen;
+
+SEC("sockops")
+__naked void sock_ops_get_sk_diff_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r7 = r1;"
+ "r6 = *(u32 *)(r7 + %[is_fullsock_off]);"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 + %[sk_off]);"
+ "if r6 != 0 goto 2f;"
+ "if r2 == 0 goto 1f;"
+ "r1 = %[diff_reg_bug_detected] ll;"
+ "r3 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r3;"
+ "goto 2f;"
+ "1:"
+ "r1 = %[diff_reg_null_seen] ll;"
+ "r3 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r1 + 0) = r3;"
+ "2:"
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_const(is_fullsock_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, is_fullsock)),
+ __imm_const(sk_off, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, sk)),
+ __imm_addr(diff_reg_bug_detected),
+ __imm_addr(diff_reg_null_seen)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 3:12 [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-06 3:12 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-04-06 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for sock_ops ctx access with same src/dst register sun jian
2026-04-06 23:01 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-04-06 3:47 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-06 4:54 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-06 23:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-04-06 16:06 ` sun jian
2026-04-06 23:03 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260406031330.187630-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox