public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com,
	andy@kernel.org
Cc: kees@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers
Date: Mon,  6 Apr 2026 13:38:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260406080852.2727453-4-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406080852.2727453-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>

From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

The SSP SPI transfer path manipulates the pending message list in
multiple places, each time open-coding the same locking and list
operations.

Re-factor the pending list add and delete logic into small helper
functions to avoid duplication and simplify transfer flow to follow.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 34 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
index 08ed92859be0..7c1780e15acf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
@@ -174,6 +174,22 @@ static int ssp_check_lines(struct ssp_data *data, bool state)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void ssp_pending_add(struct ssp_data *data,
+				   struct ssp_msg *msg)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+	list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data,
+				   struct ssp_msg *msg)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+	list_del(&msg->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+}
+
 static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 			   struct completion *done, int timeout)
 {
@@ -202,19 +218,13 @@ static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 		goto _error_locked;
 	}
 
-	if (!use_no_irq) {
-		mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
-		list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
-		mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
-	}
+	if (!use_no_irq)
+		ssp_pending_add(data, msg);
 
 	status = ssp_check_lines(data, true);
 	if (status < 0) {
-		if (!use_no_irq) {
-			mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
-			list_del(&msg->list);
-			mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
-		}
+		if (!use_no_irq)
+			ssp_pending_del(data, msg);
 		goto _error_locked;
 	}
 
@@ -224,9 +234,7 @@ static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(done,
 						msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) ==
 		    0) {
-			mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
-			list_del(&msg->list);
-			mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
+			ssp_pending_del(data, msg);
 
 			data->timeout_cnt++;
 			return -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-06  8:08 [PATCH v5 0/5] iio: ssp_sensors: improve resource cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 18:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle check Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06  8:08 ` Sanjay Chitroda [this message]
2026-04-06 20:04   ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iio: ssp_sensors: use devm APIs for mutex and IRQ resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:14   ` David Lechner
2026-04-06  8:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse preallocated RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-06 16:07   ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260406080852.2727453-4-sanjayembedded@gmail.com \
    --to=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox