Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fs-next tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree

Joseph Qi
2026-04-07T02:20:04Z

On 4/7/26 12:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 14:13:49 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>>
>> between commits:
>>
>> bdff37e327275 ("ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read")
>> 28c33de101792 ("ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()")
>>
>> from the mm-nonmm-unstable tree and commit:
>>
>> 0b2600f81cefc ("treewide: change inode->i_ino from unsigned long to u64")
>>
>> from the fs-next tree.
>
> Thanks. That's a nasty-looking conflict due to the applying order. The
> 0b2600f81cefc change is actually small, below.
>
> Hopefully Linus can figure it out ;)
>
>
Should I resend the series base on the latest linux-next?

Thanks,
Joseph

> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
> if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) !=
> ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb)) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has invalid extent list length %u\n",
> + "Inode %llu has invalid extent list length %u\n",
> inode->i_ino, le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>
> if (el->l_tree_depth) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has non zero tree depth in btree tree block %llu\n",
> + "Inode %llu has non zero tree depth in btree tree block %llu\n",
> inode->i_ino,
> (unsigned long long)eb_bh->b_blocknr);
> goto out;
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>
> if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has empty extent list at depth %u\n",
> + "Inode %llu has empty extent list at depth %u\n",
> inode->i_ino,
> le16_to_cpu(el->l_tree_depth));
> goto out;
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>
> if (!found) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in btree\n",
> + "Inode %llu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in btree\n",
> inode->i_ino,
> le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos),
> ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec));