From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
yury.norov@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, vschneid@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
huschle@linux.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de, bsegall@google.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/17] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 00:49:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407191950.643549-3-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407191950.643549-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Add documentation for new cpumask called cpu_preferred_mask. This could
help users in understanding what this mask and the concept behind it.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
index ed07efea7d02..2e926c7afc8f 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
@@ -62,6 +62,54 @@ Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules:
arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and
sleeping idle functions.
+Preferred CPUs
+==============
+
+In virtualised environments it is possible to overcommit CPU resources.
+i.e sum of virtual CPU(vCPU) of all VM's is greater than number of physical
+CPUs(pCPU). Under such conditions when all or many VM's have high utilization,
+hypervisor won't be able to satisfy the CPU requirement and has to context
+switch within or across VM. i.e hypervisor need to preempt one vCPU to run
+another. This is called vCPU preemption. This is more expensive compared to
+task context switch within a vCPU.
+
+In such cases it is better that VM's co-ordinate among themselves and ask for
+less CPU by not using some of the vCPUs. vCPUs where workload can be safely
+scheduled which won't increase any contention for pCPU are called as
+"Preferred CPUs".
+
+In most cases preferred CPUs will be same as online CPUs, when there is pCPU
+contention, Preferred CPUs will reduce based on the amount of steal time.
+When the pCPU contention goes away as indicated by steal time, Preffered CPUs
+will become same as online CPUs again. This will be done by new scheduler
+feature called STEAL_MONITOR.
+
+For scheduling decisions such as wakeup, pushing the task etc, needs this
+CPU state info. This is maintained in cpu_preferred_mask.
+
+vCPUs which are not in cpu_preferred_mask should be treated as vCPUs which
+should not be used at this moment provided it doesn't break user affinity.
+This is achieved by
+1. Selecting only a preferred CPU at wakeup.
+2. Push the task away from non-preferred CPU at tick.
+3. Only select preferred CPUs for load balance.
+
+This works only for SCHED_RT and SCHED_NORMAL. SCHED_EXT and userspace can
+make choices using cpu_preferred_mask.
+
+/sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred prints the current cpu_preferred_mask in
+cpulist format.
+
+Notes:
+1. This feature is available under CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
+2. preferred CPUs is same as online CPUs until STEAL_MONITOR is enabled.
+3. A task pinned, which can't be moved to preferred CPUs will continue
+ to run based on its affinity. But no load balancing happens
+4. If needed, steal time based governors/arch dependent method
+ could be used to cater to different types of cpu numbers.
+5. Decision to use/not use is driven by kernel. Hence it shouldn't
+ break user affinities. One of the main reason why CPU hotplug
+ or Isolated cpuset partitions was not a solution.
Possible arch/ problems
=======================
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 19:19 [PATCH v2 00/17] sched/paravirt: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 20:27 ` Yury Norov
2026-04-08 9:16 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-08 17:57 ` Yury Norov
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-08 1:05 ` Yury Norov
2026-04-08 12:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-08 18:09 ` Yury Norov
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] sched/rt: Select a preferred CPU for wakeup and pulling rt task Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] sched/feature: Add STEAL_MONITOR feature Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] sched/core: Introduce a simple steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] sched/core: Compute steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] sched/core: Handle steal values and mark CPUs as preferred Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] sched/core: Mark the direction of steal values to avoid oscillations Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] sched/debug: Add debug knobs for steal monitor Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-07 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] sched/paravirt: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-04-08 10:14 ` Hillf Danton
2026-04-08 13:49 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407191950.643549-3-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox