From: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
To: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
tao.ma@oracle.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, r33s3n6@gmail.com, zzzccc427@gmail.com,
ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix listxattr handling when the buffer is full
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:03:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410040339.3837162-1-gality369@gmail.com> (raw)
[BUG]
If an OCFS2 inode has both inline and block-based xattrs, listxattr()
can return a size larger than the caller's buffer when the inline names
consume that buffer exactly.
kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0xb7/0xd0 mm/usercopy.c:102
Call Trace:
__check_heap_object+0xe3/0x120 mm/slub.c:8243
check_heap_object mm/usercopy.c:196 [inline]
__check_object_size mm/usercopy.c:250 [inline]
__check_object_size+0x5c5/0x780 mm/usercopy.c:215
check_object_size include/linux/ucopysize.h:22 [inline]
check_copy_size include/linux/ucopysize.h:59 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:219 [inline]
listxattr+0xb0/0x170 fs/xattr.c:926
filename_listxattr fs/xattr.c:958 [inline]
path_listxattrat+0x137/0x320 fs/xattr.c:988
__do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:1001 [inline]
__se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:998 [inline]
__x64_sys_listxattr+0x7f/0xd0 fs/xattr.c:998
...
[CAUSE]
Commit 936b8834366e ("ocfs2: Refactor xattr list and remove
ocfs2_xattr_handler().") replaced the old per-handler list accounting
with ocfs2_xattr_list_entry(), but it kept using size == 0 to detect
probe mode.
That assumption stops being true once ocfs2_listxattr() finishes the
inline-xattr pass. If the inline names fill the caller buffer exactly,
the block-xattr pass runs with a non-NULL buffer and a remaining size of
zero. ocfs2_xattr_list_entry() then skips the bounds check, keeps
counting block names, and returns a positive size larger than the
supplied buffer.
[FIX]
Detect probe mode by testing whether the destination buffer pointer is
NULL instead of whether the remaining size is zero.
That restores the pre-refactor behavior and matches the OCFS2 getxattr
helpers. Once the remaining buffer reaches zero while more names are
left, the block-xattr pass now returns -ERANGE instead of reporting a
size larger than the allocated list buffer.
Fixes: 936b8834366e ("ocfs2: Refactor xattr list and remove ocfs2_xattr_handler().")
Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -906,8 +906,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_list_entry(struct super_block *sb,
prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
total_len = prefix_len + name_len + 1;
*result += total_len;
- /* we are just looking for how big our buffer needs to be */
- if (!size)
+ /* No buffer means we are only looking for the required size. */
+ if (!buffer)
return 0;
if (*result > size)
--
2.49.0
reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410040339.3837162-1-gality369@gmail.com \
--to=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=r33s3n6@gmail.com \
--cc=tao.ma@oracle.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox