From: Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment at creation
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:32:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410043243.65800-1-create0818@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409172955.98e2d20a7f7736a1a9834816@kernel.org>
Hi Masami,
I reran this in clean QEMU on two kernels and got different results.
1. Ubuntu distro kernel:
Linux 6.8.0-100-generic #100-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Tue Jan 13 16:40:06 UTC 2026
baseline count=2
after_create123 count=4
after_enable1/2/3 count=4
baseline enabled_functions:
__hid_bpf_tail_call ...
after_create123 enabled_functions:
kernel_clone (2) R ->arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x0/0x280
kmem_cache_free (1) R tramp: ... ->fprobe_handler+0x0/0x40
__hid_bpf_tail_call ...
2. Current source-tree kernel built from the clean snapshot of my patch
branch:
Linux 7.0.0-rc6 #2 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Apr 10 12:19:39 CST 2026
baseline count=0
after_create123 count=0
after_enable1 count=1
after_enable2 count=1
after_enable3 count=2
after_create123 enabled_functions:
<empty>
after_enable3 enabled_functions:
kernel_clone (2) ->arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x0/0x200
kmem_cache_free (1) tramp: ... ->fprobe_ftrace_entry+0x0/0x220
So the behavior I reported earlier reproduces on that Ubuntu 6.8 kernel,
but not on the current source-tree kernel. I think my earlier conclusion
was too broad.
I will stop pushing this testcase change for now unless I can narrow down
which kernel change caused the difference.
Thanks,
Cao Ruichuang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 11:57 [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment at creation Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-08 0:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-08 4:09 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-09 5:18 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-09 8:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-04-10 4:32 ` Cao Ruichuang [this message]
2026-04-08 4:25 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/ftrace: Account for fprobe attachment before enable Cao Ruichuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410043243.65800-1-create0818@163.com \
--to=create0818@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox