From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889753E274A for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775843614; cv=none; b=fQF47mYr5ISqIPflSAmZvoMqtoOv08D/DouxARYA6DigKnn4FCXB4w7Sb00H1WaWhfC1BI03EItgNnr/2c72x+S7K3ngonjB9pMtDbiuAWVhQ5vovcVvyG6lE4tIfOXINaAdUKGrWhgzUZT99zjsyZO+9ZrZ6kAwIgD5i6TSWrc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775843614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8SKxaz/fg5duvBKCI2u+f3xCvRfeM+qAmhyeFF4N1jk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kEm2S08QsX7GHIXQa7kellQeUdn+V8clmU/vxUi0DKn9dq/3qLTein8NE0noiroonL3vyFHP8n6jQFToX4QisJJZLG78f2alI9M0VA3XxM95mukTN2WGs5oWNSK1dylFnTzOmpKnvasIi5VXDfYJb749iV19rnYXSnL0IiTolgM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=nq41BCPZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="nq41BCPZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1775843605; bh=8SKxaz/fg5duvBKCI2u+f3xCvRfeM+qAmhyeFF4N1jk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nq41BCPZXCr7y/vgaQ3tOWGsgz3S9/tHDnRhYzgd5cOUfBJDhpbimuWy0JITn5Is3 ppJelFvKv99e8NsGeG/USyhaJSLLtQ0UnutN5lwEmHBYTvrypC5i8jCTllSEDGxT47 E2Z23/M/+qfSKA0QteRMdL4ONZe9s3awc7Y9kQPdh8YIQeg4SxNZtHY4u5roA6w7LY LtMC5KS8SIG5zeFMei17unsgLKRoc2HJD8tA0a77YvlOPv4KXOeJ3b/J8x6xdKhXFo 7gAhsocdmCnT66kJF840H7XjgzHComnJLY/GkyKJQo5qyRRw2hfT7B6ALS18ShqMjp VI0P/LBel1sSQ== Received: from fedora (unknown [100.64.0.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 177E817E09AC; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 19:53:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 19:53:20 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Karunika Choo Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nd@arm.com, Steven Price , Liviu Dudau , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/panthor: Store IRQ register base iomem pointer in panthor_irq Message-ID: <20260410195320.71be575c@fedora> In-Reply-To: <20260410164637.549145-5-karunika.choo@arm.com> References: <20260410164637.549145-1-karunika.choo@arm.com> <20260410164637.549145-5-karunika.choo@arm.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:46:33 +0100 Karunika Choo wrote: > static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev, \ > struct panthor_irq *pirq, \ > - int irq, u32 mask) \ > + int irq, u32 mask, u32 irq_baseaddr) \ Can we pass the void __iomem * directly instead of an offset to apply to ptdev->iomem? > { \ > pirq->ptdev = ptdev; \ > pirq->irq = irq; \ > pirq->mask = mask; \ > + pirq->iomem = ptdev->iomem + irq_baseaddr; \