From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Workflows <workflows@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: maintainer profiles
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 14:37:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414143733.6cbd6d62@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69dd6299440be_147c801005b@djbw-dev.notmuch>
On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:39:37 -0700
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org> wrote:
> Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there supposed to be a difference (or distinction) in the contents of
> > >
> > > Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst
> > > and
> > > Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Can they be combined into one location?
> >
> > Late to the party, sorry ... the original idea, I believe, was that
> > maintainer-handbooks.rst would be for developers looking for a guidebook
> > for a specific subsystem, while maintainer-entry-profile.rst was about
> > how maintainers themselves should write their subsystem guide.
> > Doubtless things have drifted since then... But the intended audiences
> > were different, so it might be good to think about bringing them back
> > into focus.
>
> Right, I think something (roughly / hand-wavy) like the below is the
> intent. However, as I write that I notice that the combined list is a
> bit of a mess. I also notice that there are more "P:" entries in
> MAINTAINERS than there are entries in this maintainer-handbooks.rst
> list.
>
> So this probably wants to be a script that can build Documentation links
> from MAINTAINERS, or otherwise provide a script for developers to query
> a kernel tree for additional submission guides. It is probably not as
> important for the built docs to link all guides as it is for developers
> (or their agents) to live query a tree they are developing against.
There is already a Python script which parses MAINTAINERS file
(Documentation/sphinx/maintainers_include.py).
Currently, it expects a Sphinx meta-tag inside
Documentation/process/maintainers.rst:
.. maintainers-include::
I guess it shouldn't be hard to add support there for a
.. maintainers-profile::
Making it creating a set of cross-references is probably easy. Not
sure how easy/hard would be to create a TOC tree, though.
> Note the problem goes both ways, there are P: entries not in the
> combined handbook list, like the Security subsystem, and there are
> handbook entries without a P:, like the Tip tree.
Assuming we add such extension, we'll need to sync the P: entries.
I'll take a look on trying to extend the Sphinx maintainers
extension.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> index 6020d188e13d..58e2af333692 100644
> --- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> @@ -92,24 +92,8 @@ full series, or privately send a reminder email. This section might also
> list how review works for this code area and methods to get feedback
> that are not directly from the maintainer.
>
> -Existing profiles
> ------------------
> -
> -For now, existing maintainer profiles are listed here; we will likely want
> -to do something different in the near future.
> -
> -.. toctree::
> - :maxdepth: 1
> -
> - ../doc-guide/maintainer-profile
> - ../nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile
> - ../arch/riscv/patch-acceptance
> - ../process/maintainer-soc
> - ../process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts
> - ../driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile
> - ../process/maintainer-netdev
> - ../driver-api/vfio-pci-device-specific-driver-acceptance
> - ../nvme/feature-and-quirk-policy
> - ../filesystems/nfs/nfsd-maintainer-entry-profile
> - ../filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile
> - ../mm/damon/maintainer-profile
> +Maintainer Handbooks
> +--------------------
> +
> +For examples of other subsystem handbooks see
> +Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst.
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst
> index 976391cec528..bc9299a04b1f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst
> @@ -9,14 +9,33 @@ The purpose of this document is to provide subsystem specific information
> which is supplementary to the general development process handbook
> :ref:`Documentation/process <development_process_main>`.
>
> +For developers, see below for all the known subsystem specific guides.
> +If the subsystem you are contributing to does not have a guide listed
> +here, it is fair to seek clarification of questions raised in
> +Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst.
> +
> +For maintainers, consider documenting additional requirements and
> +expectations if submissions routinely overlook specific submission
> +criteria. See Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst.
> +
> Contents:
>
> .. toctree::
> :numbered:
> :maxdepth: 2
>
> + maintainer-kvm-x86
> maintainer-netdev
> maintainer-soc
> maintainer-soc-clean-dts
> + maintainer-soc-clean-dts
> maintainer-tip
> - maintainer-kvm-x86
> + ../arch/riscv/patch-acceptance
> + ../doc-guide/maintainer-profile
> + ../driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile
> + ../driver-api/vfio-pci-device-specific-driver-acceptance
> + ../filesystems/nfs/nfsd-maintainer-entry-profile
> + ../filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile
> + ../mm/damon/maintainer-profile
> + ../nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile
> + ../nvme/feature-and-quirk-policy
Sounds good on my eyes.
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
--
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 0:18 maintainer profiles Randy Dunlap
2026-04-10 8:12 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-04-11 23:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-04-12 0:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-04-12 6:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-04-13 19:03 ` Jonathan Corbet
2026-04-13 21:39 ` Dan Williams
2026-04-13 23:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-04-14 12:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2026-04-14 14:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-04-15 0:44 ` Dan Williams
2026-04-14 11:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-15 2:03 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414143733.6cbd6d62@localhost \
--to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox